Back

A range expanding ecosystem engineer influences historical and expanded habitats via the same causal pathways

Roy, M. S.; Johnson, D. S.; Byrnes, J. E. K.

2024-02-01 ecology
10.1101/2024.01.31.578099 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Species are shifting their ranges in response to climate change. There remain many unknowns about relative impacts of range-expanding ecosystem engineers between historical and expanded habitats, however. The mud fiddler crab Minuca pugnax (=Uca pugnax) is shifting its range northward likely due to increased warming in the Gulf of Maine. A burrowing crab, M. pugnax affects ecosystem functioning in salt marshes south of Cape Cod, Massachusetts with unknown effects in expanded marsh habitats over 150km to the north. We therefore studied the M. pugnax range expansion to determine the extent that range expanding ecosystem engineers are influencing ecosystem functioning expanded ranges relative to historical habitats. We installed in 2017 and 2018 a series of crab-inclusion cages at both the UMass Boston Nantucket Field Station (historical range) and the Plum Island Estuary Long Term Ecological Research site (PIE-LTER, expanded range). For each site, year, and block, we measured in the beginning and end of the three-month experiment metrics of sediment strength, primary production, and decomposition. We developed and tested causal models using structural equation modeling (SEM) to determine direct and indirect effects of fiddler crabs on ecosystem functions. Despite site, year, and block variability, local environment influenced burrow density, which directly affected sediment strength and indirectly affected primary production in both ranges. Overall, understanding range-expanding ecosystem engineers in historical ranges was predictive for how they influence expanded habitats, despite inter-site heterogeneity. Therefore, it is critical to study relative impacts of range-expanding ecosystem engineers to understand total impacts of global range shifts.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.9%
2
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
3
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
4
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
5
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
7
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
11
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
12
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
13
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Freshwater Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.6%
18
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
20
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
24
Limnology and Oceanography
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
Coral Reefs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
27
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
28
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
30
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%