PHACTboost: A Phylogeny-aware Boosting Algorithm to Compute the Pathogenicity of Missense Mutations
Dereli, O.; Kuru, N.; Akkoyun, E.; Bircan, A.; Tastan, O.; Adebali, O.
Show abstract
Most algorithms that are used to predict the effects of variants rely on evolutionary conservation. However, a majority of such techniques compute evolutionary conservation by solely using the alignment of multiple sequences while overlooking the evolutionary context of substitution events. We had introduced PHACT, a scoring-based pathogenicity predictor for missense mutations that can leverage phylogenetic trees, in our previous study. By building on this foundation, we now propose PHACTboost, a gradient boosting tree-based classifier that combines PHACT scores with information from multiple sequence alignments, phylogenetic trees, and ancestral reconstruction. The results of comprehensive experiments on carefully constructed sets of variants demonstrated that PHACTboost can outperform 40 prevalent pathogenicity predictors reported in the dbNSFP, including conventional tools, meta-predictors, and deep learning-based approaches as well as state-of-the-art tools, AlphaMissense, EVE, and CPT-1. The superiority of PHACTboost over these methods was particularly evident in case of hard variants for which different pathogenicity predictors offered conflicting results. We provide predictions of 219 million missense variants over 20,191 proteins. PHACTboost can improve our understanding of genetic diseases and facilitate more accurate diagnoses.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Paying Attention to Attention: High Attention Sites as Indicators of Protein Family and Function in Language Models 94%
- Zero-shot segmentation using embeddings from a protein language model identifies functional regions in the human proteome 94%
- DepoScope: accurate phage depolymerase annotation and domain delineation using large language models 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.