Back

Multistability and predominant double-positive states in a four node mutually repressive network: a case study of Th1/Th2/Th17/T-reg differentiation

Duddu, A. S.; Andreas, E.; BV, H.; Grover, K.; Singh, V. R.; Hari, K.; Jhunjhunwala, S.; Cummins, B.; Gedeon, T.; Jolly, M. K.

2024-02-02 systems biology
10.1101/2024.01.30.575880 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Elucidating the emergent dynamics of complex regulatory networks enabling cellular differentiation is crucial to understand embryonic development and suggest strategies for synthetic circuit design. A well-studied network motif often driving cellular decisions is a toggle switch - a set of two mutually inhibitory lineage-specific transcription factors A and B. A toggle switch often enables two possible mutually exclusive states - (high A, low B) and (low A, high B) - from a common progenitor cell. However, the dynamics of networks enabling differentiation of more than two cell types from a progenitor cell is not well-studied. Here, we investigate the dynamics of four master regulators A, B, C and D inhibiting each other, thus forming a toggle tetrahedron. Our simulations show that a toggle tetrahedron predominantly allows for co-existence of six double positive or hybrid states where two of the nodes are expressed relatively high as compared to the remaining two - (high A, high B, low C, low D), (high A, low B, high C, low D), (high A, low B, low C, high D), (low A, high B, high C, low D), (low A, low B, high C, high D) and (low A, high B, low C, high D). Stochastic simulations showed state-switching among these phenotypes, indicating phenotypic plasticity. Finally, we apply our results to understand the differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells into Th1, Th2, Th17 and Treg subsets, suggesting Th1/Th2/Th17/Treg decision-making to be a two-step process. Our results reveal multistable dynamics and establish the stable co-existence of hybrid cell-states, offering a potential explanation for simultaneous differentiation of multipotent naive CD4+ T cells.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.4%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
6
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
8
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
9
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
12
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
13
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.5%
14
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
21
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Biosystems
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
25
FEBS Letters
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
29
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%