Back

A deep-learning-based two-compartment predictive model (PKRNN-2CM) for vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring

Mao, B.; Xie, Z.; Nigo, M.; Rasmy, L.; Zhi, D.

2024-01-31 health informatics
10.1101/2024.01.30.24302025 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveVancomycin is a widely used antibiotic that requires therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for optimized individual dosage. The deep learning-based model PKRNN-1CM has shown the advantage of leveraging time series electronic health record (EHR) data for individualized estimation of vancomycin pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. While one-compartment (1CM) PK models are commonly used because of their simplicity and previous trough-based clinical practices for dose adjustment, the pre-deep learning literature suggests the superiority of two-compartment models (2CM). Motivated by this, we introduce a novel deep-learning-based approach, PKRNN-2CM, for vancomycin TDM. MethodsPKRNN-2CM combines RNN-driven PK parameter estimation with a 2CM PK model to predict vancomycin concentration trajectories. Training on both simulated data and real-world EHR data allows for a comprehensive evaluation of its performance. ResultsExperiments based on simulated data highlight PKRNN-2CMs superiority over the simpler 1CM model PKRNN-1CM (PKRNN-2CM RMSE=1.30, PKRNN-1CM RMSE=2.50). Application to real data showcases significant improvement over PKRNN-1CM (PKRNN-2CM RMSE=5.62, PKRNN-1CM RMSE=5.84, two-sample unpaired t-test p-value=0.01), with potential further gains expected with non-trough level measurements. ConclusionPKRNN-2CM is an important improvement in vancomycin TDM, demonstrating enhanced accuracy and performance compared to the PKRNN-1CM model. This deep learning model holds potential for future individualized vancomycin TDM optimization and broader application in diverse clinical scenarios.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.