Discovering additional genetic loci associated with six psychiatric disorders/traits via FDR regression model leveraging external genetic and biological data
RAO, S.; Qiu, J.-h.; ZHI, Y.-q.; Lin, Y.-p.; Zhang, R.-y.; Chen, X.-t.; Xu, D.; So, H.-C.
Show abstract
BackgroundCommon psychiatric disorders have substantial heritability influenced by multiple genes. While a number of susceptibility variants have been identified, many associated variants remain undiscovered. This study aimed to identify additional genetic loci associated with common psychiatric disorders/traits by leveraging correlated traits and biological annotations. MethodsWe proposed application of the false discovery rate (FDR) regression model to uncover additional genetic loci for six psychiatric disorders/traits. To enhance the likelihood of discovering additional significant genetic loci and genes, we utilized a set of 42 correlated traits and 21 biological annotations as covariates. Internal validation analysis and drug cluster enrichment analysis were conducted to validate the biological significance of the additional genetic loci/genes uncovered. We also experimentally validated two additional genes revealed for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). ResultsThe FDR regression (FDRreg) analysis strategy revealed hundreds of additional significant genes (FDR<0.01) in gene-level analyses, surpassing the number of significant genes found in the original studies. Specifically, in 11/16 trait analyses, FDRreg identified more significant genes based on gene-based analysis with MAGMA, and in 12/16 analyses, FDRreg identified more significant genes based on imputed expression in the brain. In SNP-level results, the majority of analyses (13/16) identified an equal or higher number of genomic risk loci (FDR<0.01). We found that FDRreg is able to reveal genes that are later known to be significant in subsequent larger-scale GWAS. Drug cluster enrichment analysis demonstrated a stronger enrichment in psychiatry-related drug clusters. In utero electroporation (IUE) experiments provided evidence to support two additional genes identified for ASD in critical embryonic brain development processes. ConclusionsBy integrating genetically correlated traits and biological annotations, the FDRreg strategy enables the identification of a greater number of additional significant genes and risk loci. Moreover, the new associated genes exhibited meaningful biological and clinical implications. This study presents a valuable approach for uncovering the genetic basis of psychiatric disorders and gaining insights into their underlying biology.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mendelian randomization integrating GWAS and eQTL data revealed genes pleiotropically associated with major depressive disorder 96%
- Divergent gene expression in alcohol and opioid usedisorders results in consistent alterations in functional networks in the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex 94%
- Pairwise genetic meta-analyses between schizophrenia and substance dependence phenotypes reveals novel association signals 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Polygenic risk scores for psychiatric, inflammatory, and cardio-metabolic traits and diseases highlight possible genetic overlaps with suicide attempt and treatment-emergent suicidal ideation 94%
- Improving Machine Learning Prediction of ADHD Using Gene Set Polygenic Risk Scores and Risk Scores from Genetically Correlated Phenotypes 94%
- Multi-polygenic scores in psychiatry: from disorder-specific to transdiagnostic perspectives 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Altered Expression Of A Unique Set Of Genes Reveals Complex Etiology Of Schizophrenia 93%
- Blood transcriptome analysis suggests an indirect molecular association of early life adversities and adult social anxiety disorder by immune-related signal transduction 93%
- Cross-continental environmental and genome-wide association study on children and adolescent anxiety and depression 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.