Back

Floria: Fast and accurate strain haplotyping in metagenomes

Shaw, J.; Gounot, J.-S.; Chen, H.; Nagarajan, N.; Yu, Y. W.

2024-01-31 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.01.28.577669 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Shotgun metagenomics allows for direct analysis of microbial community genetics, but scalable computational methods for the recovery of bacterial strain genomes from microbiomes remains a key challenge. We introduce Floria, a novel method designed for rapid and accurate recovery of strain haplotypes from short and long-read metagenome sequencing data, based on minimum error correction (MEC) read clustering and a strain-preserving network flow model. Floria can function as a standalone haplotyping method, outputting alleles and reads that co-occur on the same strain, as well as an end-to-end read-to-assembly pipeline (Floria-PL) for strain-level assembly. Benchmarking evaluations on synthetic metagenomes showed that Floria is > 3x faster and recovers 21% more strain content than base-level assembly methods (Strainberry), while being over an order of magnitude faster when only phasing is required. Applying Floria to a set of 109 deeply sequenced nanopore metagenomes took <20 minutes on average per sample, and identified several species that have consistent strain heterogeneity. Applying Florias short-read haplotyping to a longitudinal gut metagenomics dataset revealed a dynamic multi-strain Anaerostipes hadrus community with frequent strain loss and emergence events over 636 days. With Floria, accurate haplotyping of metagenomic datasets takes mere minutes on standard workstations, paving the way for extensive strain-level metagenomic analyses. AvailabilityFloria is available at https://github.com/bluenote-1577/floria, and the Floria-PL pipeline is available at https://github.com/jsgounot/Floria_analysis_workflow.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.