Back

Genetic Dynamics of Mustang and Feral Horse Populations in the Western United States

Cothran, E. G.; Khanshour, A.; Funk, S. M. W.; Conant, E.; Juras, R.; Davis, B. W.

2024-01-31 genetics
10.1101/2024.01.28.577652 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The history and population dynamics of feral horse and wild mustang population in the Western United States has led to diverse populations of disparate ancestry. These iconic populations are currently managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and their genetic history is of great interest for both management and conservation purposes. We examined population genetic parameters using 12 well established microsatellite loci in nearly 8,500 horses representing 235 populations sampled across more than 20 years. Samples were collected by BLM or by members of other management agencies from 10 states. Genetic variability and genetic resemblance to domestic horse breeds using multiple methods were estimated. A wide range of variation levels were observed across the populations. In general, within-population variability was slightly lower than what has been found in domestic horse breeds, but still retains diversity. As expected, levels of population variation correlated to census size. Several populations were sampled longitudinally with intervals between sampling of about 5 years. For these longitudinal samples, there was no trend towards an increase or decline in diversity, indicating consistent management practices. Relationships between populations and domestic breeds ranged from close association to one or two specific breeds to extreme divergence of the feral horses to all breeds examined. Reasons for divergence are mainly related to the founding of the population and subsequent demographic history. Overall, there was a slight tendency for geographically close feral populations to be more similar to each other than to more distant populations. The results of this study show the feral horse populations in the western US have a considerable variation, though management practices can strongly influence variability levels.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
28.3%
2
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
5
Genetics Selection Evolution
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
7
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
8
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
9
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
12
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
13
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
14
Poultry Science
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
15
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
22
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
24
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
25
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%