Back

Transcriptomic and epigenetic responses shed light on soybean resistance to Phytophthora sansomeana

Lee, G.; DiBiase, C. N.; Liu, B.; Li, T.; McCoy, A. G.; Chilvers, M. I.; Sun, L.; Wang, D.; Lin, F.; Zhao, M.

2024-01-30 plant biology
10.1101/2024.01.27.577583 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Phytophthora root rot caused by oomycete pathogens in the Phytophthora genus poses a significant threat to soybean productivity. While resistance mechanisms against Phytophthora sojae have been extensively studied in soybean, the molecular basis underlying immune responses to Phytophthora sansomeana remains unclear. We investigated transcriptomic and epigenetic responses of two resistant (Colfax and NE2701) and two susceptible (Williams 82 and Senaki) soybean lines at four time points (2, 4, 8, and 16 hours post inoculation, hpi) after P. sansomeana inoculation. Comparative transcriptomic analyses revealed a greater number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) upon pathogen inoculation in resistant lines, particularly at 8 and 16 hpi, predominantly associated with ethylene and reactive oxygen species-mediated defense pathways. Moreover, DE transposons were predominantly up-regulated after inoculation and enriched near genes in Colfax. A long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) within the mapped region of the resistance gene exhibited exclusive up-regulation in the resistant lines after inoculation, potentially regulating two flanking LURP-one-related genes. Furthermore, DNA methylation analysis revealed increased CHH methylation levels in lncRNAs after inoculation, with delayed responses in Colfax compared to Williams 82. Overall, our results provide comprehensive insights into soybean responses to P. sansomeana, highlighting potential roles of lncRNAs and epigenetic regulation in plant defense.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.