Decoding the Microbiome-Metabolome Nexus: A Systematic Benchmark of Integrative Strategies
Mangnier, L.; Bodein, A.; Mariaz, M.; Scott-Boyer, M.-P.; Mathieu, A.; Vashist, N.; Bramble, M.; Droit, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe exponential growth of high-throughput sequencing technologies was an incredible opportunity for researchers to combine various -omics within computational frameworks. Among these, metagenomics and metabolomics data have gained an increasing interest due to their involvement in many complex diseases. However, currently, no standard seems to emerge for jointly integrating both microbiome and metabolome datasets within statistical models. ResultsThus, in this paper we comprehensively benchmarked nineteen different integrative methods to untangle the complex relationships between microorganisms and metabolites. Methods evaluated in this paper cover most of the researchers goals such as global associations, data summarization, individual associations, and feature selection. Through an extensive and realistic simulation we identified best methods across questions commonly encountered by researchers. We applied the most promising methods in an application to real gut microbial datasets, unraveling complementary biological processes involved between the two omics. We also provided practical guidelines for practitioners tailored to specific scientific questions and data types. ConclusionIn summary, our work paves the way toward establishing research standards when mutually analyzing metagenomics and metabolomics data, building foundations for future methodological developments.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- parafac4microbiome: Exploratory analysis of longitudinal microbiome data using Parallel Factor Analysis 98%
- Addressing the dynamic nature of reference data: a new nt database for robust metagenomic classification 94%
- MNetClass: A Control-Free Microbial Network Clustering Framework for Identifying Central Subcommunities Across Ecological Niches 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.