Multi-V-Stain: Multiplexed Virtual Staining of Histopathology Whole-Slide Images
Andani, S.; Chen, B.; Ficek-Pascual, J.; Heinke, S.; Casanova, R.; Sobottka, B.; Bodenmiller, B.; The Tumor Profiler Consortium, ; Kölzer, V. H.; Rätsch, G.
Show abstract
Multiplexed protein imaging offers valuable insights into interactions between tumors and their surrounding tumor microenvironment (TME), but its widespread use is limited by cost, time, and tissue availability. We present HistoPlexer, a deep learning framework that generates spatially resolved protein multiplexes directly from standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) histopathology images. HistoPlexer jointly predicts multiple tumor and immune markers using a conditional generative adversarial architecture with custom loss functions designed to ensure pixel- and embedding-level similarity while mitigating slice-to-slice variations. A comprehensive evaluation on metastatic melanoma samples demonstrates that HistoPlexer-generated protein maps closely resemble real maps, as validated by expert assessment. They preserve crucial biological relationships by capturing spatial co-localization patterns among proteins. The spatial distribution of immune infiltration from HistoPlexer-generated protein multiplex enables stratification of tumors into immune subtypes. In an independent cohort, integration of HistoPlexer-derived features into predictive models enhances performance in survival prediction and immune subtype classification compared to models using H&E features alone. To assess broader applicability, we benchmarked HistoPlexer on publicly available pixel-aligned datasets from different cancer types. In all settings, HistoPlexer consistently outperformed baseline methods, demonstrating robustness across diverse tissue types and imaging conditions. By enabling whole-slide protein multiplex generation from routine H&E images, HistoPlexer offers a cost- and time-efficient approach to tumor microenvironment characterization with strong potential to advance precision oncology.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- STPath: A Generative Foundation Model for Integrating Spatial Transcriptomics and Whole Slide Images 97%
- Biologically-informed deep neural networks provide quantitative assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity in post-treatment glioblastoma 94%
- FedWeight: Mitigating Covariate Shift of Federated Learning on Electronic Health Records Data through Patients Re-weighting 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing large multimodal models for one-shot learning and interpretability in biomedical image classification 95%
- Label-free virtual peritoneal lavage cytology via deep-learning-assisted single-color stimulated Raman scattering microscopy 94%
- Efficient and Explainable Deep Neural Networks for Airway Symptom Detection in Support of Wearable Health Technology 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.