Understanding children's behavioral health outcomes: A story of overcoming trauma and building strengths
McAllister, J. H.; Vsevolozhskaya, O. A.; Tong, X.; Lakin, D. P.; Fairhurst, S. K.; Lyons, J. S.
Show abstract
BackgroundAmong children enrolled in behavioral health treatment, those with multiple trauma experiences (known as Adverse Childhood Experiences, or ACEs) typically see worse outcomes. In this study, we examine whether having or building strengths can help such children become more resilient and experience better outcomes. ObjectiveWe examined the relationship between childrens traumatic experiences, strengths, and clinical improvement, testing whether building strengths can help reduce the negative impact of ACEs on childrens response to treatment. Participants and SettingWe used data from an evidence-based assessment to understand the clinical and functional needs and strengths of 5,423 children (ages 6-20) receiving treatment between 2019 and 2022 within a large community agency located in California. MethodsTo classify children by both level and rate of improvement, we relied on machine learning and principal components analysis. To determine the relationships between ACEs, strengths, and improvement, we used a variety of predictive models and descriptive analyses. ResultsAfter classifying children as being either "Faster", "Slower", or "Minimal" improvers, our analyses revealed that while higher total ACEs increases the likelihood of being a Slower improver, this effect can be mitigated by building strengths. ConclusionsThese results suggest that children with more ACEs are likely to require a longer duration of treatment before improvement is seen. They also suggest that promoting resilience-- specifically focusing on building strengths--may lead to more efficient and effective care, particularly for children with significant trauma histories.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed methods analysis of youth mental health intervention feasibility and acceptability in a North American city: perspectives from Seattle, Washington 93%
- MOSAIC (MOthers’ AdvocateS In the Community) for Pregnant Women and Mothers of Children Under 5 with Experience of Intimate Partner Violence: A pilot randomized trial study protocol 92%
- Mindfulness supports emotional resilience in children during the COVID-19 Pandemic 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- "What matters in help-seeking and disclosure intent of intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic:Similarities and differences across demographic groups" 91%
- A Cohort Study: Evaluating Self-Efficacy in Adolescents Attending a Tailored Youth-Informed Breastfeeding Program 90%
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Financial Hardship and Social Assistance as Determinants of Mental Health and Food and Housing Insecurity During the COVID-19 Pandemic 88%
- Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Racial/Ethnic Differences in Mortality by Cause of Death 88%
- Willing but Unable: Physicians’ Referral Knowledge as Barriers to Abortion Care 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mechanisms for the prevention of adolescent intimate partner violence: a realist review of interventions in low- and middle-income countries 91%
- Correlates of behavioral and emotional disorders among school-going adolescents in Uganda 91%
- Awareness, utility and preferences of campus-based mental health services at tertiary institutions in Harare Zimbabwe: a cross-sectional study. 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Special Issue: Demographic and Mental Health Assessments in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study: Updates and Longitudinal Trajectories 94%
- Academic Success and Mental Health: The Paradox of Frontoparietal-Default Mode Network Coupling among Children Facing Poverty 90%
- Missing data approaches for longitudinal neuroimaging research: Examples from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.