Occupational differences in COVID-19 hospital admission and mortality risks between women and men in Scotland: a population-based study using linked administrative data
Pattaro, S.; Bailey, N.; Dibben, C.
Show abstract
IntroductionOccupations vary with respect to workplace factors that influence exposure to COVID-19, such as ventilation, social contacts and protective equipment. Variations between women and men may arise because they have different occupational roles or behavioural responses. We estimate occupational differences in COVID-19 hospital admission and mortality risks by sex. MethodsWe combined individual-level data from 2011 Census with (i) health records and (ii) household-level information from residential identifiers. We used data for a cohort of 1.7 million Scottish adults aged 40-64 years between 1 March 2020 and 31 January 2021. We estimated age-standardised COVID-19 hospital admission and mortality rates, stratified by sex and occupation. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we estimated COVID-19 hospital admission and death risks, adjusting for relevant factors. ResultsGenerally, women had lower age-standardised COVID-19 hospital admission and mortality rates compared to men. Among women, adjusted death risks were lower for health professionals, and those in associate professional and technical occupations (paramedics and medical technicians). Among men, elevated adjusted admission and death risks were observed for large vehicle and taxi drivers. Additionally, admission risks remained high among men working in caring personal services, including home and care workers, while elevated risks were observed among women working in customer service occupations (call centre operators) and as process, plant and machine operatives (assemblers/sorters). ConclusionOccupational differences in COVID-19 hospital admission and mortality risks between women and men highlight the need to account for sex differences when developing interventions to reduce infections among vulnerable occupational groups.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Occupation and COVID-19 mortality in England: a national linked data study of 14.3 million adults 98%
- Covid-19 Risk by work-related factors: Pooled analysis of individual linked data from 14 cohorts 96%
- Occupation, Work-Related Contact, and SARS-CoV-2 Anti-Nucleocapsid Serological Status: Findings from the Virus Watch prospective cohort study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population-level changes in the mental health of UK workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study using Understanding Society 95%
- Characteristics of those most vulnerable to employment changes during the Covid-19 pandemic: a nationally representative cross-sectional study in Wales 94%
- Deprivation and Exposure to Public Activities during the COVID-19 Pandemic in England and Wales 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of death among teachers in England and Wales during the Covid19 pandemic 96%
- Acute and long-term impacts of COVID-19 on economic vulnerability: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK) 95%
- Inequalities in healthcare disruptions during the Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from 12 UK population-based longitudinal studies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in COVID-19-related mortality across key demographic and clinical subgroups: an observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform on 18 million adults in England 92%
- High seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among people living in precarious situations in Ile de France 92%
- Community prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in England during April to September 2020: Results from the ONS Coronavirus Infection Survey 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.