Optimizing Accuracy and Efficiency in Analyzing Non-UMI Liquid Biopsy Datasets Using the Sentieon ctDNA Pipeline
Niu, L.; Hu, J.; Chen, C.; Jiang, C.; Chen, H.; Tang, G.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.
Show abstract
Sequencing clinical liquid biopsy, especially circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), provides a valuable method for identifying low allele frequency tumor variants, opening novel clinical applications, particularly in treatment selection for late-stage cancer patients. Despite advancements, challenges in assay development persist, primarily due to limited sample volumes and insufficiency of reads supporting low allele frequency variants. The allele frequencies of clinically significant variants often hover close to the threshold of errors introduced by PCR and sequencing processes. Therefore, more sophisticated analysis methods are crucial to further reduce base error rates, enabling accurate discrimination between background errors and genuine somatic variants. While several ctDNA analysis pipelines have been published and adopted, there is room for improvement in terms of accuracy and run efficiency. In this study, we introduce Sentieons innovative consensus-based ctDNA pipeline - a rapid and precise solution for calling small somatic variants from non-UMI ctDNA sequencing data. The pipeline comprises four core modules: alignment, consensus generation, variant calling, and variant filtering. Through benchmarking with in-vitro and real clinical datasets, we observed that the Sentieon ctDNA pipeline exhibits higher accuracy compared to alternative methods.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating discordant somatic calls across mutation discovery approaches to minimize false negative drug-resistant findings 96%
- PanelCAT: an Open-Source Comparative Analysis Tool for Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Target Regions 95%
- Bridge Capture Permits Cost-Efficient, Rapid and Sensitive Molecular Precision Diagnostics 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole genome sequencing with AVITI and NovaSeq X Plus reveals comparable performance with contextual biases 95%
- Characterization and Mitigation of Fragmentation Enzyme-Induced Dual Stranded Artifacts 95%
- iCOMIC: a graphical interface-driven bioinformatics pipeline for analyzing cancer omics data 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.