Back

Can't carve air, can't weave names: Plant species used in Colombian artisan crafts are not equally assessed for vulnerability at the international and national level

Hernandez, K. V.; Andrade-Rivas, F.; Zapata, F.; Batista, N.; Cardenas-Navarrete, A.; Davila Arenas, A.; Herrera-R, G. A.; Langhans, K. E.; Levey, D.; Neill, A.; Nguyen, O.; Ocampo-Penuela, N.; Sanchez Lopez, S.; Echeverri, A.

2024-01-26 ecology
10.1101/2024.01.24.573691 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Humanity has maintained cultural connections with our environments for time immemorial. Plants and artisan crafts are a prime example, as craft purpose, skill, design, and species used can vary greatly between communities and the loss of a critical plant species can result in a loss of access to cultural craft practices. To mitigate global biodiversity loss, conservationists are faced with the challenge of assessing species vulnerability to extinction and prioritizing species for conservation funding using information instruments, like the IUCN red list. This process does not necessarily consider a species cultural importance. In this paper we sought to address this gap for plant species used in artisan crafts in Colombia. We aim to answer the following: (1) how represented are endemic species in artisan crafts; (2) how threatened are artisan craft species according to (a) international and (b) national vulnerability status? We used the number of species-associated common names as a proxy for cultural awareness. We found that continentally regional species were far more represented in Colombian artisan crafts than national endemics. We also found a strong positive relationship between number of common names and national vulnerability assessment status, but no statistically significant relationship for international vulnerability status. Based on our results, well-known plants used in Colombian artisan crafts are more likely to be assessed nationally than internationally. While the IUCN is thorough in their recommendations, more can be done to prioritize the inclusion of conservation assessments for species based on their contributions to cultural diversity. Positionality statementWe are 14 scientists and practitioners who are deeply committed to the conservation of nature and culture in a changing world. We are trained in diverse fields including ecology, evolutionary biology, botany, music, anthropology, law, and public health. We all have postgraduate academic education (Masters or PhDs underway) but most of us are early career scholars. Six of us grew up in Colombia and we represent many places including Mexico, the United States, Ireland, Chile, Brazil, Germany, and Viet Nam. None of us self-identify as Indigenous.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.3%
3
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
6
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
9
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
12
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
15
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.6%
24
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%