Back

AutScore- An integrative scoring approach for prioritization of ultra-rare autism spectrum disorder candidate variants from whole exome sequencing data

Shil, A.; Arava, N.; Levi, N.; Levine, L.; Golan, H.; Meiri, G.; Michaelovski, A.; Tsadaka, Y.; Aran, A.; Menashe, I.

2024-01-25 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.01.24.24301544 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDiscerning clinically relevant ASD candidate variants from whole-exome sequencing (WES) data is complex, time-consuming, and labor-intensive. To this end, we developed AutScore, an integrative prioritization algorithm of ASD candidate variants from WES data, and assessed its performance to detect clinically relevant variants. MethodsWe studied WES data from 581 ASD probands, and their parents registered in the Azrieli National Center database for Autism and Neurodevelopment Research. We focused on rare allele frequency <1%), high-quality proband-specific variants affecting genes associated with ASD or other neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). We assigned a score (i.e., AutScore) to each such variant based on their pathogenicity, clinical relevance, gene-disease association, and inheritance patterns. Finally, we compared the AutScore performance with the rating of clinical experts and the NDD variants prioritization algorithm, AutoCasC. ResultsOverall, 1161 ultra-rare variants distributed in 687 genes in 441 ASD probands were evaluated by AutScore with scores ranging from -4 to 25, with a mean {+/-} SD of 5.89 {+/-} 4.18. AutScore cut-off of [&ge;] 12 outperforms AutoCasC in detecting clinically relevant ASD variants, with a detection accuracy rate of 72.3% and an overall diagnostic yield of 11.9%. Sixteen variants with AutScore of [&ge;] 12 were distributed in fifteen novel ASD genes. ConclusionAutScore is an effective automated ranking system for ASD candidate variants that could be implemented in ASD clinical genetics pipelines.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.