The dilemma of underestimating freshwater biodiversity: morphological and molecular approaches
Schoenle, A.; Scepanski, D.; Floss, A.; Buechel, P.; Koblitz, A.-K.; Scherwass, A.; Arndt, H.; Waldvogel, A.-M.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe Lower Rhine ecosystem has been extensively shaped by human activities, destroying, modifying, and even creating novel water bodies as habitats. Freshwater systems are hotspots of biodiversity and highly complex ecosystems. However, knowledge and description of its biodiversity across all trophic levels is still incomplete and the complexity of interactions remains unresolved, especially below the micro scale. This is even true for important international inland waterways such as the River Rhine. We here document the biodiversity of the Lower Rhine and associated water bodies, spanning from the level of protists up to the level of larger invertebrate predators and herbivores organized in faunal size classes (nano-, micro, meio- and macrofauna). This study is part of a long-term ecological research project (LTER-D REES). Our study includes two riprap sections of the rivers main channel, two oxbows and two gravel-pit lakes in the rivers flood plain. Diversity was assessed through morphotype richness and metabarcoding, as well as accounting for sediment composition. ResultsWe found high discrepancies between amplicon sequencing variants (ASVs) and morphotype richness in all size classes, as well as a problematic limitation of reference sequences from freshwater organisms in public databases. Irrespective of the size class, we observed habitat specific zoobenthos communities in each of the three investigated habitat types, with few taxa or taxonomic groups overlapping. ConclusionsOur results demonstrate the importance to integrate different methodologies and extend freshwater sequencing efforts for the assessment of biodiversity across all trophic levels, as particularly relevant for long term projects.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Environmental DNA as a complementary tool for biodiversity monitoring: A multi-technique and multi-trophic approach to investigate cetacean distribution and feeding ecology 95%
- Defining the sediment microbiome of the Indian River Lagoon, FL, USA, an Estuary of National Significance 95%
- From the Andes to the desert: First characterization of bacterial communities in the Rimac river, the main source of water for Lima, Peru 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-marker DNA metabarcoding detects suites of environmental gradients from an urban harbour 96%
- Grazing pressure-induced shift in planktonic bacterial communities with the dominance of acIII-A1 actinobacterial lineage in soda pans 96%
- The critical role of natural history museums in advancing eDNA for biodiversity studies: a case study with Amazonian fishes 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- eDNA in a bottleneck: obstacles to fish metabarcoding studies in megadiverse freshwater systems 95%
- Metabarcoding unsorted kick-samples facilitates macroinvertebrate-based biomonitoring with increased taxonomic resolution, while outperforming environmental DNA 95%
- Limited dispersion and quick degradation of environmental DNA in fish ponds inferred by metabarcoding 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- From short to long reads: enhanced protist diversity profiling via Nanopore metabarcoding 96%
- Read counts from environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reflect fish abundance and biomass in drained ponds 95%
- Can metabarcoding resolve intraspecific genetic diversity changes to environmental stressors? A test case using river macrozoobenthos 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Beyond the limits of the unassigned protist microbiome: inferring large-scale spatio-temporal patterns of marine parasites 96%
- Ocean-wide comparisons of mesopelagic planktonic community structures 95%
- Carbon and microbes in a degrading palsa mire are distinct from peatland and a wider connected sub-Arctic fluvial system 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.