Back

Treatment of a genetic liver disease in mice through transient prime editor expression

Rothgangl, T.; Ioannidi, E. I.; Weber, Y.; Talas, A.; Boeck, D.; Matsushita, M.; Villiger, E. A.; Schmidheini, L.; Moon, J.; Lin, P. J. C.; Fan, S. H. Y.; Marquart, K. F.; Schwerdel, C.; Rimann, N.; Faccin, E.; Cremonesi, A.; Villiger, L.; Muramatsu, H.; Vadovics, M.; Thoeny, B.; Kopf, M.; Haeberle, J.; Pardi, N.; Tam, Y. K.; Schwank, G.

2024-01-24 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.01.22.575834 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Prime editing is a versatile genome editing technology that does not rely on DNA double-strand break formation and homology-directed repair (HDR). This makes it a promising tool for correcting pathogenic mutations in tissues consisting predominantly of postmitotic cells, such as the liver. While recent studies have already demonstrated proof-of-concept for in vivo prime editing, the use of viral delivery vectors resulted in prolonged prime editor (PE) expression, posing challenges for clinical application. Here, we developed an in vivo prime editing approach where we delivered the pegRNA using self-complementary adeno-associated viral (scAAV) vectors and the prime editor using nucleoside-modified mRNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). This methodology led to transient expression of the PE for 48h and 26% editing at the Dnmt1 locus using AAV doses of 2.5x1013 vector genomes (vg)/kg and a single dose of 3mg/kg mRNA-LNP. When targeting the pathogenic mutation in the Pahenu2 mouse model of phenylketonuria (PKU), we achieved 4.3% gene correction using an AAV dose of 2.5x1013 vg/kg and three doses of 2 mg/kg mRNA-LNP. Editing was specific to the liver and the intended locus, and was sufficient to reduce blood L-phenylalanine (Phe) levels from over 1500 {micro}mol/l to below the therapeutic threshold of 600 {micro}mol/l. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of in vivo gene correction in the liver with transient PE expression, bringing prime editing closer to clinical application.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
43.6%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 21%
9.0%
50% of probability mass above
3
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
4
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
5
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
6
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.2%
8
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
9
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
The CRISPR Journal
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
12
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
13
Molecular Therapy Methods & Clinical Development
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
14
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
15
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
19
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%