The changes of BMI in prediction of 10-year-hypertension risk in United States population- a historical cohort study
Zou, H.; Wang, C.; Sun, W.; Kong, X.-Q.; Jiang, M.; Zou, H.-Y.-Y.
Show abstract
BACKGROUNDThis is a historical cohort study, utilizing data from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2018 to predict 10-year- hypertension-risk based on body mass index (BMI) variations. METHODParticipants aged 40-79 without a hypertension diagnosis 10 years before the baseline interview were included. Subjects were categorized based on five major BMI variation patterns. Various statistical analyses, including Chi-square test, T test, univariate and multivariate logistic regression, and P-trend analysis, were employed to assess hypertension incidence among groups. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) were used to examine the age-hypertension correlation. RESULTSAmong 13,287 participants, Stable-Norm (maintaining normal BMI) exhibited the lowest 10-year hypertension risk. Other patterns--Max-OW (maximum BMI in overweight), OB-nOB (obese to non-obese), nOB-OB (non-obese to obese), and Stable-OB (maintaining obese)--showed increasing risks. Hypertension risk correlated quasi-linearly with age. Subgroups analysis suggested certain specific BMI variation modes and absolute weight change groups demonstrated equivalent risks to stable normal/weight groups, while others presented higher risks. CONCLUSIONMaintaining normal BMI had the lowest 10-year hypertension risk, and returning to normal BMI showed equivalent risk. Weight gain remained a significant hypertension risk factor in US adults, particularly with advancing age.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Undiagnosed hypertension and its associated factors in India: A rural-urban contrast from the National Family Health Survey (2019-21) 97%
- Association of METS-IR Index with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-sectional Analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data from 2009 to 2018 96%
- Prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors according to urbanization level, gender and age, in apparently healthy adults living in Gabon, Central Africa 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The prediction of cardiovascular events by phenotype of central and peripheral blood pressure in subjects without hypertension 97%
- Factors Associated with Treatment-Resistant Hypertension: Results of a prospective observational Study 95%
- Within-visit Blood Pressure Variability in Children and Adolescents in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2013-2020) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using machine learning to evaluate the value of genetic liabilities in classification of hypertension within the UK Biobank 93%
- Polycystic ovary syndrome susceptibility loci inform disease etiological heterogeneity 92%
- Exploring the Association Between Urinary Incontinence and Depression Based on a Series of Large-Scale National Health Studies in Turkiye 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can machine learning improve risk prediction of incident hypertension? An internal method comparison and external validation of the Framingham risk model using HUNT Study data 93%
- The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors but not angiotensin receptor blockers in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is associated with a lower risk of mortality 93%
- Pool walking may temporarily improve renal function by suppressing renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in pregnant women 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in Awareness, Antihypertensive Medication Use and Blood Pressure Control by Race and Ethnicity Among Adults with Hypertension in the United States: A National Health and Nutrition Examination Analysis from 2011 to 2018 95%
- Evolving patterns of prevalence and management of hypertension phenotypes in Mexico: A two-decade analysis of nationally representative surveys 94%
- Hypertension Management Dynamics in Pediatric CKD: Insights from the 4C Study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.