Social Norms and Security and Justice Services for Gender-based Violence in Nepal: Programmatic Implications from a Baseline Mixed-Methods Assessment
Clark, C. J.; Batayeh, B.; Shao, I.; Bergenfeld, I.; Pandey, M.; Sharma, S.; Shrestha, S.; Gourisankar, A.; Gautam, A.; Solail, T. J.; Shakya, H.; Morrow, G.; Shervinskie, A.; Soti, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundGender-based violence (GBV) is highly prevalent throughout the world. Only a small fraction of survivors seek help from security and justice providers (S&J) such as the police or courts, due in part to social norms that discourage help-seeking. Social norms interventions have proven effective in combatting GBV but have not been tested alongside S&J interventions. The Strengthening Access to Holistic, Gender Responsive, and Accountable Justice in Nepal (SAHAJ) project was designed to fill this gap. We provide a comprehensive mixed-methods situation analysis of GBV-related social norms, help-seeking, S&J service provision. MethodsThe SAHAJ evaluation is a 3-armed, mixed-methods evaluation of the impact of social norms programming alone, S&J programming alone, and combined programming in 17 communities in Nepal. Baseline data included a household survey (N=3830), a sub-study of youth (N=143) and married adults (N=464) in one site and qualitative data collection including interviews with S&J service providers, help-seeking GBV survivors and families (N=68), and focus group discussions with police, youth groups, and school management committees (N=20) in four sites. Descriptive analysis of survey data was triangulated with findings from a modified grounded theory analysis of the qualitative data to elucidate the role of social norms and other barriers limiting help-seeking. ResultsGBV was perceived to be common, especially child marriage, domestic violence, eve-teasing, and dowry-related violence. Formal help-seeking was low, despite positive attitudes towards S&J providers. Participants described injunctive norms discouraging formal reporting in cases of GBV and sanctions for women violating these norms. ConclusionsNorms favoring family- and community-based mediation remain strong. Sanctions for formal reporting remain a deterrent to help-seeking. Leveraging gender-equitable role models, such as female S&J providers, and connecting S&J providers to women and youth may capitalize on existing shifts.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- “We are their eyes and ears here on the ground, yet they do not appreciate us” - Factors influencing the performance of Kenyan community health volunteers working in urban informal settlements 96%
- Community-based newborn care intervention fidelity and its implementation drivers in South Wollo Zone, North-east Ethiopia 95%
- The cascading impacts of attacks on health in Syria: A qualitative study of health system and community impacts 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sexual health knowledge acquisition processes among very young adolescent girls in rural Malawi: Implications for sexual and reproductive health programs 96%
- Latent classes of men’s intimate partner violence perpetration and attitudes towards gender norms: a UN multi-country, cross-sectional study in Asia and the Pacific 96%
- Perceived Barriers in Accessing Sexual and Reproductive Health Services for Youth in Lao People’s Democratic Republic 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A cross-sectional study of COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs and prevention behaviors among adults in Senegal 95%
- The Menstrual Practice Needs Scale Short Form (MPNS-SF) and Rapid (MPNS-R): Development in Khulna, Bangladesh, and validation in cross-sectional surveys from Bangladesh and Uganda 94%
- Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Utilization of Facility-Based Essential Maternal and Child Health Services in North Shewa Zone, Ethiopia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Global Measurement of Physical Intimate Partner Violence to Monitor Sustainable Development Goal 5 95%
- Interrupting the intergenerational cycle of violence: protocol for a three-generational longitudinal mixed-methods study in South Africa (INTERRUPT_VIOLENCE) 95%
- "We have our reasons": Exploring the acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Ghana 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- How does public knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors correlate in relation to COVID-19? A community-based cross-sectional study in Nepal 93%
- Cross-sector Decision Landscape in Response to COVID-19: A Qualitative Analysis of North Carolina Decision-Makers 93%
- A Development and Implementation of a Preconception Counseling Program for Black Women and Men in the Southeastern United States: A Pilot Protocol 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.