Quantifying Interpretation Reproducibility in Vision Transformer Models with TAVAC
Zhao, Y.; Agyemang, D.; Liu, Y.; Mahoney, M.; Li, S.
Show abstract
The use of deep learning algorithms to extract meaningful diagnostic features from biomedical images holds the promise to improve patient care given the expansion of digital pathology. Among these deep learning models, Vision Transformer (ViT) models have been demonstrated to capture long-range spatial relationships with more robust prediction power for image classification tasks than regular convolutional neural network (CNN) models, and also better model interpretability. Model interpretation is important for understanding and elucidating how a deep learning model makes predictions, especially for developing transparent models for digital pathology. However, like other deep learning algorithms, with limited annotated biomedical imaging datasets, ViT models are prone to poor performance due to overfitting, which can lead to false predictions due to random noise. Overfitting affects model interpretation when predictions are made out of random noise. To address this issue, we introduce a novel metric - Training Attention and Validation Attention Consistency (TAVAC) - for evaluating ViT model degree of overfitting on imaging datasets and quantifying the reproducibility of interpretation. Specifically, the model interpretation is performed by comparing the high-attention regions in the image between training and testing. We test the method on four publicly available image classification datasets and two independent breast cancer histological image datasets. All overfitted models exhibited significantly lower TAVAC scores than the good-fit models. The TAVAC score quantitatively measures the level of generalization of model interpretation on a fine-grained level for small groups of cells in each H&E image, which cannot be provided by traditional performance evaluation metrics like prediction accuracy. Furthermore, the application of TAVAC extends beyond medical diagnostic AI models; it enhances the monitoring of model interpretative reproducibility at pixel-resolution in basic research, to reveal critical spatial patterns and cellular structures essential to understanding biological processes and disease mechanisms. TAVAC sets a new standard for evaluating the performance of deep learning model interpretation and provides a method for determining the significance of high-attention regions detected from the attention map of the biomedical images.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- RETINA: Reconstruction-based Pre-Trained Enhanced TransUNet for Electron Microscopy Segmentation on the CEM500K Dataset 96%
- Teaching deep networks to see shape: Lessons from a simplified visual world. 94%
- A Deep Learning approach for time-consistent cell cycle phase prediction from microscopy data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Framework for Falsifiable Explanations of Machine Learning Models with an Application in Computational Pathology 96%
- Spatial Transcriptomics Expression Prediction from Histopathology Based on Cross-Modal Mask Reconstruction and Contrastive Learning 94%
- Clinical Validation of Saliency Maps for Understanding Deep Neural Networks in Ophthalmology 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.