Back

An AI Method for Assessing Coding Consistency in a Large Dataset

Nelson, S. J.; Yiny, Y.; Shao, Y.; Ma, P.; Tuttle, M. S.; Zeng-Treitler, Q.

2024-01-17 health informatics
10.1101/2024.01.17.24301268 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveWe developed a method to assess the consistency of the assignment of ICD codes, using coding performed at a United States health system at the time of the transition from ICD-9CM to ICD-10CM. MethodsUsing clusters of equivalent codes derived from the US Centers for Disease Control General Equivalence Mapping (GEM) tables, ICD assignments occurring during the ICD-9CM to ICD-10CM transition were evaluated in EHR data from the US Veterans Administration Central Data Warehouse, using a deep learning model based on 860 covariates. The model was then used to detect abrupt changes across the transition; additionally changes at each VA station were examined. ResultsMany of the 687 most-used code clusters had ICD-10CM assignments differing greatly from that predicted by the GEM from the codes used in ICD-9CM. Notably, the observed transition patterns varied widely across care locations. ConclusionMachine learning can model variability across time and across location, enabling an assessment of coding consistency. Expert review is not scalable, deep learning model applied to a large dataset of EHR records provides an approximation of ground truth.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.