Back

Bayesian Estimation of Cooccurrence Affinity with Dyadic Regression

Newbury, A.

2025-08-22 ecology
10.1101/2024.01.16.575941 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIEstimating underlying co-occurrence relationships between pairs of species has long been a challenging task in ecology as the extent to which species co-occur is partially dependent on their prevalence. While recent work has taken large steps towards solving this problem, the next question is how to assess the factors that influence co-occurrence. C_LIO_LIHere, I show that a recently proposed co-occurrence metric can be improved upon by assigning Bayesian priors to the latent co-occurrence relationships being estimated. In the context of analysing the factors that affect co-occurrence relationships, I demonstrate the need for a generalised linear model (GLM) that takes raw data (co-occurrences and species prevalence) not derived quantities (co-occurrence metrics) as its data. Next, I show the form that such a GLM should take in order to perform Bayesian inference while accounting for non-independence of dyadic matrix data (e.g. distance and co-occurrence matrices). C_LIO_LII then present 3 example analyses to highlight the types of scientific questions these methods can help answer, using existing data sets - measuring the effects of trait dissimilarity among dung beetle species and relatedness between ant species on co-occurrence, and constructing co-occurrence networks of bacteria found in cystic fibrosis patient sputum samples. C_LIO_LIFinally, I present the software package CooccurrenceRegression.jl, which provides a straightforward interface for researchers to put these methods into practice. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.