Back

Generative AI for Cardiac Organoid Florescence Generation

Kandula, A. K. R.; Phamornratanakun, T.; Gomez, A. H.; Bhoi, R.; El-Mokahal, M.; Feng, Y.; Yang, H.

2024-01-16 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.01.15.575724 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractHuman pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)-derived cardiac organoid is the most recent three-dimensional tissue structure that mimics the structure and functionality of the human heart and plays a pivotal role in modeling heart development and disease. The hPSC-derived cardiac organoids are commonly characterized by bright-field microscopic imaging for tracking daily organoid differentiation and morphology formation. Although the brightfield microscope provides essential information about hPSC- derived cardiac organoids, such as morphology, size, and general structure, it does not extend our understanding of cardiac organoids on cell type-specific distribution and structure. Then, fluorescence microscopic imaging is required to identify the specific cardiovascular cell types in the hPSC-derived cardiac organoids by fluorescence immunostaining fixed organoid samples or fluorescence reporter imaging of live organoids. Both approaches require extra steps of experiments and techniques and do not provide general information on hPSC-derived cardiac organoids from different batches of differentiation and characterization, which limits the biomedical applications of hPSC-derived cardiac organoids. This research addresses this limitation by proposing a comprehensive workflow for colorizing phase contrast images of cardiac organoids from brightfield microscopic imaging using conditional Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) to provide cardiovascular cell type-specific information in hPSC-derived cardiac organoids. By infusing these phase contrast images with accurate fluorescence colorization, our approach aims to unlock the hidden wealth of cell type, structure, and further quantifications of fluorescence intensity and area, for better characterizing hPSC-derived cardiac organoids.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.8%
4
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
6
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.6%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.1%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.6%
11
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
12
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.4%
13
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
17
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
19
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
28
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%