Back

Psychological and social risk factors and pregnancy outcome: a prospective cohort study

Schipper, E.-J. I.; Wardenaar, K. J.; Bolte, A. C.; Monden, R.; van Os, T. W. D. P.; Wichers, M.; de Jonge, P.

2024-01-15 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2024.01.14.24301280 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundResearch suggests that besides somatic factors, psychological and social factors are associated with pregnancy outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine the independent effects of psychosocial risk factors on maternal blood pressure, gestational age at birth, birthweight and Apgar score. MethodsIn a prospective cohort study, Dutch women in the first half of pregnancy were recruited at a regional hospital, a university hospital and ten midwife practices. At inclusion, participants (before 20 weeks of gestation) filled in questionnaires on social and psychological factors. Obstetric data were extracted from patient records. Associations between risk factors and pregnancy outcomes were analysed with multivariable linear and logistic regression. Results598 Women were included in the study. 14 Women did not return questionnaires and 12 women stopped study participation before delivery. In multivariable regression analysis, primiparity, Odds Ratio [OR] = 3.4 (1.5, 7.5), obstetric and somatic history, OR = 3.5 (1.5, 7.9), and diastolic blood pressure at intake, OR = 1.1 (1.0, 1.1), were independently associated with preterm delivery. Smoking status, OR = 5.5 (2.3, 13), was independently associated with a newborn small for gestational age, and primiparity, OR = 6.9 (1.1, 45), with a low Apgar score. Diastolic blood pressure at intake, OR = 1.1 (1.07, 1.14), hypertension at intake, OR = 3.6 (1.1, 11), and negative affect, OR = 1.1 (1.02, 1.14), were independently associated with gestational hypertension. Negative affect was the only psychosocial risk factor independently associated with pregnancy outcome. ConclusionAlthough psychosocial factors are important in obstetric care, measurement of these factors in early pregnancy seems to have limited independent predictive value for adverse pregnancy outcome when medical and/or obstetric history and commonly applied physical measurements are already considered.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.1%
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.8%
7
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
11
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
12
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
14
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
17
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
19
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
22
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
24
Bioscience Reports
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%