Psychological and social risk factors and pregnancy outcome: a prospective cohort study
Schipper, E.-J. I.; Wardenaar, K. J.; Bolte, A. C.; Monden, R.; van Os, T. W. D. P.; Wichers, M.; de Jonge, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundResearch suggests that besides somatic factors, psychological and social factors are associated with pregnancy outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine the independent effects of psychosocial risk factors on maternal blood pressure, gestational age at birth, birthweight and Apgar score. MethodsIn a prospective cohort study, Dutch women in the first half of pregnancy were recruited at a regional hospital, a university hospital and ten midwife practices. At inclusion, participants (before 20 weeks of gestation) filled in questionnaires on social and psychological factors. Obstetric data were extracted from patient records. Associations between risk factors and pregnancy outcomes were analysed with multivariable linear and logistic regression. Results598 Women were included in the study. 14 Women did not return questionnaires and 12 women stopped study participation before delivery. In multivariable regression analysis, primiparity, Odds Ratio [OR] = 3.4 (1.5, 7.5), obstetric and somatic history, OR = 3.5 (1.5, 7.9), and diastolic blood pressure at intake, OR = 1.1 (1.0, 1.1), were independently associated with preterm delivery. Smoking status, OR = 5.5 (2.3, 13), was independently associated with a newborn small for gestational age, and primiparity, OR = 6.9 (1.1, 45), with a low Apgar score. Diastolic blood pressure at intake, OR = 1.1 (1.07, 1.14), hypertension at intake, OR = 3.6 (1.1, 11), and negative affect, OR = 1.1 (1.02, 1.14), were independently associated with gestational hypertension. Negative affect was the only psychosocial risk factor independently associated with pregnancy outcome. ConclusionAlthough psychosocial factors are important in obstetric care, measurement of these factors in early pregnancy seems to have limited independent predictive value for adverse pregnancy outcome when medical and/or obstetric history and commonly applied physical measurements are already considered.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 95%
- Social inequalities in pregnancy metabolic profile: findings from the multi-ethnic Born in Bradford cohort study 94%
- Monitoring One Heart to Help Two: Heart Rate Variability and Resting Heart Rate using Wearable Technology in Active Women Across the Perinatal Period 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Weighting of risk factors for low birth weight: A linked routine data cohort study in Wales, UK 95%
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 93%
- Exploring Multilevel Determinants of Stillbirth: A Comprehensive Analysis Across Sub-Saharan African Countries 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exposure to trauma in pregnant women and its association with previous perinatal complications, IPV and antenatal service satisfaction in rural Ethiopia: a cross-sectional facility-based study 94%
- Changes in pregnancy-related serum biomarkers early in gestation are associated with later development of preeclampsia 94%
- Population birth outcomes in 2020 and experiences of expectant mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a ‘Born in Wales’ mixed methods study using routine data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Synergistic effects of cardiovascular health and social isolation on adverse pregnancy outcomes 95%
- Giving birth under hospital visitor restrictions: Heightened acute stress in childbirth in COVID-19 positive women 95%
- Pregnancy-induced changes in blood composition drive post-partum hemorrhage risk 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.