Using a health equity lens to measure patient experiences of care in diverse healthcare settings
Browne, A. J.; Varcoe, C.; Ford-Gilboe, M.; Wathen, C. N.; Wilson, E.; Bungay, V.; Perrin, N.
Show abstract
People who are structurally disadvantaged and marginalized often report poor health care experiences due to intersecting forms of stigma and discrimination. There are many measures of patient experiences of care, however, few are designed to measure equity-oriented care. In alignment with ongoing calls to integrate actions in support of health equity, we report on the development and testing of patient experiences of care measures that explicitly use a health equity and intersectional lens. Our analysis focuses on two different equity-oriented health care scales. The first was piloted in a primary health care setting, where patients have an ongoing relationship with providers over time. The second was piloted in an emergency department, where care is provided on an episodic basis. Item Response Theory was used to develop the scales and evaluate their psychometric properties. The primary health care scale, tested with a cohort of 567 patients, showed that providing more equity-oriented health care predicted improvements in important patient self-report health outcomes over time. The episodic scale, tested in an emergency department setting with 284 patients, showed evidence of concurrent validity, based on a high correlation with quality of care. Both scales are brief, easy-to-administer self-report measures that can support organizations to monitor quality of care using an equity lens. The availability of both scales enhances the possibility of measuring equity-oriented health care in diverse contexts. Both scales can shed light on experiences of care using an intersectional lens and equity-oriented lens, providing a nuanced understanding of quality of care.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Essential Indicators of Quality in Primary Care Settings: An Evidence-Based, Structured, Expert Approach 94%
- Determinants of regulatory compliance in health and social care services: a systematic review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 93%
- Health Complexity Assessment in Primary Care: a validity and feasibility study of the INTERMED tool 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Listening to older voices: Results of a cross-sectional survey of older patient-reported experiences of facility-based healthcare in Nouna, Burkina Faso 93%
- Sources of Stress and Coping Mechanisms: Experiences of Maternal Health Care Providers in Western Kenya 92%
- “I can be a source of motivation”: Perspectives from stakeholders of the I’mPossible fellowship, a peer-led differentiated service delivery model for adolescents with perinatally acquired HIV in India 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating Community-Based Health Information System with a Patient-Centered Medical Home to Improve Care of Patients with Hypertension: A Longitudinal Observational Study Protocol 92%
- Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review 92%
- Navigating uncertain illness trajectories for young children with serious infectious illness: a mixed-methods modified grounded theory study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and psychometric testing of EPAT-16: A short and valid measure for patient-centeredness from the patient’s perspective 93%
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 93%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding the influence of leadership, organisation, and policy on delivering an integrated child health and social care service in community settings: A qualitative exploration using the SELFIE framework 93%
- Long-term Public Healthcare Burden Associated with Intimate Partner Violence among Canadian Women: A Cohort Study 92%
- A novel methodology to measure waiting times for community-based specialist care in a public healthcare system 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.