Back

Accurate Detection of Lead Malfunction From ECG-derived Bipolar Pacing Stimulus Amplitude

Lloyd, M.; Pelling, M.; Ibrahim, R.; El-Chami, M. F.; Iravanian, S.

2024-01-13 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.01.12.24301251 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOne of the most common modes of lead failure is outer insulation breach which may result in myopotential noise and device malfunction. "Pseudo-unipolarization" of bipolar pacing stimuli, as observed from a routine 12-lead ECG has been observed with insulation breaches. We sought to characterize this ECG finding to detect lead this type of lead malfunction. Methods138 transvenous leads were analyzed (88 with known malfunction and 50 normal leads). The highest amplitude (any of 12-leads on standard ECG, 10mm/mV, GE Marquette) of a bipolar pacing stimulus on ECG was recorded and compared to a control dataset of newly implanted leads. An ROC curve for maximum ECG bipolar pacing stimulus amplitude was generated for prediction of lead functional status (normal vs malfunction). ResultsThe cohort (49% females, 34% non-white) had an average age of 67 {+/-} 16 years at implant. The malfunction group consisted of 61% RA and 39% RV leads with mean pacing output 2.74V at 0.5ms. There was a significant difference in ECG bipolar stimulus amplitudes at time of identification of failure (15.06 {+/-} 13.533mm or 7.89 {+/-} 7.56mm per V, p<0.001) compared to those of normal leads (2.54 {+/-} 1.265mm or 0.86 {+/-} 0.41mm per V). An EKG stimulus amplitude cut-off at 3.5mm for the prediction of this type of lead malfunction demonstrated a sensitivity of 86.4% and a specificity of 76%. When normalized for programmed stimulus output, a cutoff of 5mm/V demonstrated a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 92% (AUC 0.967 95% CI 0.938-0.996). ConclusionFor a given output, the maximum amplitude of a bipolar pacing stimulus on ECG is significantly lower in normal functioning leads compared to those with known malfunction due to insulation breach. This simply-derived variable demonstrated good accuracy at identifying this lead failure due to insulation breach and exposed electrodes.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
52.2%
50% of probability mass above
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
3
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
4
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
6
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
7
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
8
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
9
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
10
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
12
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
14
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
15
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
19
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
20
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
21
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.5%