Back

Early detection and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage: a cost-effectiveness analysis of the E-MOTIVE trial

Williams, E. V.; Goranitis, I.; Oppong, R.; Perry, S. J.; Devall, A.; Martin, J. T.; Mammoliti, K.-M.; Beeson, L.; Sindhu, K. N.; Galadanci, H.; Alwy Al-beity, F.; Qureshi, Z.; Hofmeyr, G. J.; Moran, N.; Fawcus, S.; Mandondo, S.; Middleton, L.; Hemming, K.; Oladapo, O. T.; Gallos, I.; Coomarasamy, A.; Roberts, T. E.

2024-01-12 health economics
10.1101/2024.01.11.23300121 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTimely detection and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) are crucial to prevent complications or death. A calibrated blood-collection drape can help provide objective, accurate, and early diagnosis of PPH and a treatment bundle can address delays or inconsistencies in the use of effective interventions. MethodsWe conducted an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis alongside the E-MOTIVE trial, an international, parallel cluster-randomised trial with a baseline control phase, designed to assess a multi-component intervention for PPH in patients having vaginal delivery. We compared the E-MOTIVE intervention, which included a calibrated blood-collection drape for early detection of PPH and a bundle of first-response treatments (uterine massage, oxytocic drugs, tranexamic acid, intravenous fluids, examination, and escalation), with usual care. We used multilevel modelling to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios from the perspective of the public healthcare system for outcomes of cost per case of severe PPH (blood loss [≥]1000 mL) prevented and cost per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted. ResultsA total of 80 secondary-level hospitals across Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, and Tanzania, in which 210,132 patients underwent vaginal delivery, were randomly assigned to the E-MOTIVE group or the usual-care group. Among hospitals and patients with data, severe PPH was diagnosed in 1.6% of patients in the E-MOTIVE group and 4.3% of patients in the usual-care group (risk difference, -2.6%; 95% CI -3.1% to -2.1%). Mean DALYs per patient were lower for the E-MOTIVE group (-0.0027; 95% CI -0.0081 to 0.0029) whilst mean costs per patient were slightly higher compared with the usual-care group (0.30 USD; 95% CI -2.31 to 2.78). The E-MOTIVE intervention was deemed cost-effective at contemporary willingness-to-pay thresholds and remained cost-effective across the full range of sensitivity and country-level analyses. InterpretationUse of a calibrated blood-collection drape for early detection of PPH and bundled first-response treatment is cost-effective and should be perceived by decision makers as a worthwhile use of healthcare budgets. FundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation (NCT04341662).

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.