Back

Knowledge is not all you need to generate trust in AI use in healthcare

Li, A. K. C.; Rauf, I. A.; Keshavjee, K.

2024-01-11 health informatics
10.1101/2024.01.10.24301097
Show abstract

BackgroundCanada has invested significantly in artificial intelligence (AI) research and development over the last several years. Canadians knowledge of and attitudes towards AI in healthcare are understudied. ObjectivesTo explore the relationships between age, gender, education level, and income on Canadians knowledge of AI, their comfort with its use in healthcare, and their comfort with using personal health data in AI research. MethodsOrdinal logistics regression and multivariate polynomial regression were applied to data from the 2021 Canadian Digital Health Survey using RStudio and SigmaZones Design of Experiments Pro. ResultsFemale and older Canadians self-report less knowledge about AI than males and other genders and younger Canadians. Female Canadians and healthcare professionals are less comfortable with use of AI in healthcare compared to males and people with other levels of education. Discomfort appears to stem from concerns about data security and the current maturity level of the technology. ConclusionKnowledge of AI and the use of AI in healthcare are inversely correlated with age and directly correlated with education and income levels. Overall, female respondents self-reported less knowledge and comfort with AI in healthcare and research than other genders. Privacy concerns should continue to be addressed as a major consideration when implementing AI tools. Canadians, especially older females, not only need more education about AI in healthcare, but also need more reassurance about the safe and responsible use of their data and how bias and other issues with AI are being addressed. Author SummaryArtificial intelligence (AI) and its application has garnered significant public interest and excitement within healthcare in recent years. However, its successful integration and use in healthcare will depend on patient and user adoption. As a result, AI tools may be limited in healthcare when user concerns are not carefully addressed and if patients are not educated about how these technologies work. While there have been studies on the attitudes of clinicians and healthcare professionals toward AI, little is known about the general publics perception of AI within the healthcare setting. Our study addresses this gap in the literature by analyzing data from the 2021 Canadian Digital Health Survey to understand the relationships between Canadians attitudes towards AI and various socioeconomic and demographic factors. Our results found that older Canadians, Canadians with less formal education and women need to be better informed about the safe and responsible use of AI and be reassured about good data security practices before it can be broadly accepted by them. In addition, the element of trust may be a factor that is contributing to the higher levels of discomfort with AI observed in middle-aged Canadians. The findings from this study will help stakeholders better implement and broaden the accessibility of AI technologies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Digital Health
based on 88 papers
Top 0.2%
17.4%
2
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
based on 13 papers
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 2%
6.5%
4
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 62%
6.5%
5
JMIR Formative Research
based on 31 papers
Top 0.8%
4.6%
6
JAMIA Open
based on 35 papers
Top 2%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
based on 53 papers
Top 3%
4.6%
8
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
based on 36 papers
Top 3%
4.6%
9
DIGITAL HEALTH
based on 11 papers
Top 0.3%
2.9%
10
JMIR Medical Informatics
based on 16 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
11
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
12
Frontiers in Digital Health
based on 18 papers
Top 0.7%
2.9%
13
International Journal of Medical Informatics
based on 25 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
14
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 6%
2.9%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 10%
2.9%
16
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
17
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
based on 37 papers
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 80%
1.2%
19
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 50%
0.8%
20
The Lancet Digital Health
based on 25 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Patterns
based on 15 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Healthcare
based on 14 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
23
BMC Medical Research Methodology
based on 41 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
based on 11 papers
Top 3%
0.7%