Knowledge is not all you need to generate trust in AI use in healthcare
Li, A. K. C.; Rauf, I. A.; Keshavjee, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundCanada has invested significantly in artificial intelligence (AI) research and development over the last several years. Canadians knowledge of and attitudes towards AI in healthcare are understudied. ObjectivesTo explore the relationships between age, gender, education level, and income on Canadians knowledge of AI, their comfort with its use in healthcare, and their comfort with using personal health data in AI research. MethodsOrdinal logistics regression and multivariate polynomial regression were applied to data from the 2021 Canadian Digital Health Survey using RStudio and SigmaZones Design of Experiments Pro. ResultsFemale and older Canadians self-report less knowledge about AI than males and other genders and younger Canadians. Female Canadians and healthcare professionals are less comfortable with use of AI in healthcare compared to males and people with other levels of education. Discomfort appears to stem from concerns about data security and the current maturity level of the technology. ConclusionKnowledge of AI and the use of AI in healthcare are inversely correlated with age and directly correlated with education and income levels. Overall, female respondents self-reported less knowledge and comfort with AI in healthcare and research than other genders. Privacy concerns should continue to be addressed as a major consideration when implementing AI tools. Canadians, especially older females, not only need more education about AI in healthcare, but also need more reassurance about the safe and responsible use of their data and how bias and other issues with AI are being addressed. Author SummaryArtificial intelligence (AI) and its application has garnered significant public interest and excitement within healthcare in recent years. However, its successful integration and use in healthcare will depend on patient and user adoption. As a result, AI tools may be limited in healthcare when user concerns are not carefully addressed and if patients are not educated about how these technologies work. While there have been studies on the attitudes of clinicians and healthcare professionals toward AI, little is known about the general publics perception of AI within the healthcare setting. Our study addresses this gap in the literature by analyzing data from the 2021 Canadian Digital Health Survey to understand the relationships between Canadians attitudes towards AI and various socioeconomic and demographic factors. Our results found that older Canadians, Canadians with less formal education and women need to be better informed about the safe and responsible use of AI and be reassured about good data security practices before it can be broadly accepted by them. In addition, the element of trust may be a factor that is contributing to the higher levels of discomfort with AI observed in middle-aged Canadians. The findings from this study will help stakeholders better implement and broaden the accessibility of AI technologies.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 95%
- Defining Destigmatizing Design Guidelines for Use in Sexual Health-Related Digital Technologies: A Delphi Study 95%
- Exploring Factors Affecting the Adoption and Continuance Usage of Drone in Healthcare: The Role of the Environment 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validating a Clinical Decision Support System for Palliative Care using healthcare professionals’ insights 95%
- Enhancing Uploads of Health Data in the Electronic Health Record - The Role of Framing and Length of Privacy Information 94%
- The experiences of 33 national COVID-19 dashboard teams during the first year of the pandemic in the WHO European Region: a qualitative study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 94%
- What matters to patients?: a timely question for Value Based Care 94%
- Artificial Intelligence for Contextual Well-being: Protocol for an Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Study with Medical Students as a Social Microcosm 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 97%
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 95%
- Development of a customised data management system for a COVID-19-adapted colorectal cancer pathway 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Synthetic Data Generation in Healthcare: A Scoping Review of reviews on domains, motivations, and future applications 95%
- Development and Evaluation of MADDIE: Method to Acquire Delivery Date Information from Electronic Health Records 95%
- Digital applications to support self-management of multimorbidity: A scoping review 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.