Back

Towards a phylogenomic classification of Magnoliidae

Helmstetter, A. J.; Ezedin, Z.; Lirio, E. J. d.; Oliveira, S. M. d.; Chatrou, L. W.; Erkens, R. H. J.; Larridon, I.; Leempoel, K.; Maurin, O.; Roy, S.; Zuntini, A. R.; Baker, W. J.; Couvreur, T. L. P.; Forest, F.; Sauquet, H.

2024-01-10 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.01.09.574948 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PremiseMagnoliidae are a strongly supported clade of angiosperms. Previous phylogenetic studies based primarily on analyses of a limited number of mostly plastid markers have led to the current classification of magnoliids into four orders and 18 families. However, uncertainty remains regarding the placement of several families. MethodsHere we present the first comprehensive phylogenomic analysis of Magnoliidae as a whole, sampling 235 species from 199 (74%) genera and representing all families and most previously accepted subfamilies and tribes. We analyze newly generated data from the Angiosperms353 probe set using both coalescent and concatenation analyses and testing the impact of multiple filtering and alignment strategies. ResultsWhile our results generally provide further support for previously established phylogenetic relationships in both magnoliids as a whole and large families including Annonaceae and Lauraceae, they also provide new evidence for previously ambiguous relationships. In particular, we find support for the position of Hydnoraceae as sister to the remainder of Piperales and, for the first time, resolve the backbone of relationships among most genera of Myristicaceae. ConclusionsAlthough some of our results are limited by low gene recovery for a number of taxa and significant gene tree conflict for some relationships, this study represents a significant step towards reconstructing the evolutionary history of a major lineage of angiosperms. Based on these results, we present an updated phylogenetic classification for Magnoliidae, recognizing 21 families, summarizing previously established subfamilies and tribes, and describing new tribes for Myristicaceae.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.8%
3
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.0%
5
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
6
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Systematic Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
8
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
9
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
10
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.0%
13
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
15
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
21
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
25
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
26
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%