Back

Single versus Combination Treatment in Tinnitus: A Randomized, Multicenter Trial

Schoisswohl, S.; Basso, L.; Simoes, J.; Engelke, M.; Langguth, B.; Mazurek, B.; Lopez-Escamez, J. A.; Kikidis, D.; Cima, R.; Bernal-Robledano, A.; Boecking, B.; Bulla, J.; Cederroth, C. R.; Denys, S.; Escalera-Balsera, A.; Gallego-Martinez, A.; Gallus, S.; Hidalgo-Lopez, L.; Jarach, C. M.; Kader, H.; Koller, M.; Lugo, A.; Marcrum, S. C.; Markatos, N.; Martin-Lagos, J.; Martinez-Martinez, M.; Muller-Locatelli, N.; Neff, P.; Niemann, U.; Perez-Carpena, P.; Pryss, R.; Puga, C.; Robles-Bolivar, P.; Rose, M.; Schecklmann, M.; Schiele, T.; Schleicher, M.; Schobel, J.; Spiliopoulou, M.; Stark, S.; St

2024-01-12 otolaryngology
10.1101/2024.01.09.24300978 medRxiv
Show abstract

Tinnitus is associated with a variety of aetiologies, phenotypes, and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, and available treatments have limited efficacy. A combination of treatments, addressing various aspects of tinnitus, might provide a viable and superior treatment strategy. In this international multicentre, parallel-arm, superiority, randomised controlled trial, patients with chronic subjective tinnitus were recruited from five clinical sites across the EU as part of the interdisciplinary collaborative UNITI project. Patients were randomly assigned using a web-based system, stratified by their hearing and distress level, to single or combination treatment of 12 weeks. Cognitive-behavioural therapy, hearing aids, structured counselling, and sound therapy were administered either alone or as a combination of two treatments resulting in ten treatment arms. The primary outcome was the difference in the change from baseline to week 12 in the total score of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) between single and combination treatments in the intention-to-treat population. All statistical analysis were performed blinded to treatment allocation. 674 patients of both sexes aged between 18 and 80 years were screened for eligibility. 461 participants (190 females) with chronic subjective tinnitus and at least mild tinnitus handicap were enrolled, 230 of which were randomly assigned to single and 231 to combination treatment. Least-squares mean changes from baseline to week 12 were -11.7 for single treatment (95% confidence interval [CI], -14.4 to -9.0) and -14.9 for combination treatments (95% CI, -17.7 to -12.1), with a statistically significant group difference (p=0.034). Cognitive-behavioural therapy and hearing aids alone had large effect sizes, which could not be further increased by combination treatment. No serious adverse events occurred. In this trial involving patients with chronic tinnitus, all treatment arms showed improvement in THI scores from baseline to week 12. Combination treatments showed a stronger clinical effect than single treatment, however, no clear synergistic effect was observed when combining treatments. We observed rather a compensatory effect, where a more effective treatment offsets the clinical effects of a less effective treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04663828.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.3%
5
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.5%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
7
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
9
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
10
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
12
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
15
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
17
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
18
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
20
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
21
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
22
Journal of Psychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
24
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Schizophrenia
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%