Biases in the Willingness to Download a mHealth App: A Discrete Choices Experimental Study Among Nigerian Healthcare App Subscribers
OGBAGA, I.
Show abstract
BackgroundAlthough there has been an increase in the availability of mobile health (mHealth) tools globally and their potential benefits for both healthcare providers and patients, the adoption of mHealth is still relatively low. Additionally, only a limited number of studies have investigated the intention of individuals to download mHealth apps. ObjectiveWe conducted a study to explore peoples inclination towards using a health app. MethodsWe conducted the study in Nigeria using a discrete choice experiment. The study had a sample size of 2800 participants who were presented with two different attributes and levels. These attributes were price ($20 = N 17932.80 [at a currency exchange rate of $1= N896.64], and free subscription option) and data protection (with options of data protection vs no data protection). The participants were randomly assigned to the different attribute and level options. For the analysis, we used the conditional logistic model. ResultsAccording to the results of the study, the likelihood of downloading a mHealth app is significantly higher when the app is offered for free. The study also found that users tend to ignore data protection specifications, and instead prioritize free subscription offers while showing reluctance towards apps that come with a price tag. ConclusionsThe use of mobile health (mHealth) tools has a high potential in reducing healthcare costs and enhancing the efficacy of traditional health interventions and therapies. The major driving forces behind the increasing adoption of mHealth apps in the future are cost reduction and the establishment of sound business models. It is crucial to establish reliable standards for mHealth apps, which can include information about pricing and legislation regarding data protection, to ensure that potential consumers can make informed decisions.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Factors Affecting the Adoption and Continuance Usage of Drone in Healthcare: The Role of the Environment 95%
- Defining Destigmatizing Design Guidelines for Use in Sexual Health-Related Digital Technologies: A Delphi Study 94%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validating a Clinical Decision Support System for Palliative Care using healthcare professionals’ insights 94%
- Understanding the Impact of Digital Technology on the Well-being of Older Immigrants and Refugees: A Scoping Review Protocol 92%
- Enhancing Uploads of Health Data in the Electronic Health Record - The Role of Framing and Length of Privacy Information 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Web-based, Mobile Responsive Application to Screen Healthcare Workers for COVID Symptoms: Descriptive Study 94%
- Applications and barriers to use of an mHealth iPhone application for self-management of chronic recurrent medical conditions: A Pilot Study 94%
- Iterative Development of a Mobile Phone Application to Support Community Health Volunteers during Cervical Cancer Screening in Western Kenya 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 94%
- Has the pandemic enhanced and sustained digital health-seeking behaviour? A big data interrupted time-series analysis of Google Trends 93%
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- User Perceptions of Individually-Tailored Health Information in 1 Digital Apps: Development of a Scale 94%
- Implementing Home-Based Digital Health in Rural Canada: A Scoping Review 92%
- The development of a World Health Organization transdiagnostic chatbot intervention for distressed adolescents and young adults 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.