Back

Binucleated cell formation and oncogene expression after particulate matter exposure is preceded by microtubule disruption, dysregulated cell cycle, prolonged mitosis, and septin binding

Podlipec, R.; Sebastijanovic, A.; Cassidy, H.; Han, L.; Danielsen, P.; Cotar, P.; Kokot, H.; Korosevic Koser, B.; Vencelj, A.; Pirker, L.; Umek, P.; Hlawacek, G.; Heller, R.; Matallanas, D.; Pelicon, P.; Stoeger, T.; Urbancic, I.; Vogel, U.; Koklic, T.; Strancar, J.

2024-01-08 cancer biology
10.1101/2024.01.07.574515 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Several biopersistent high aspect ratio nanomaterials show pronounced pathogenic effects, from chronic lung inflammation and fibrosis to cancer. For example, asbestos fibers are classified as carcinogens, whereas the carcinogenicity of highly inflammatory multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), and TiO2 nanomaterials is still being evaluated. The exact early mechanisms of their pathogenicity towards inflammation and cancer remains uncertain, but it is likely not due to genotoxic or mutagenic activity. A proposed early mode of action that might lead to the formation of cancerous cells for asbestos fibers is the formation of binucleated and multinucleated cells, resulting in genetic instability. Here, we show that two high aspect ratio nanomaterials, MWCNTs and TiO2 nanotubes, which both induce chronic lung inflammation, induce very different cancer-related changes in vitro. TiO2 nanotubes - but not low aspect-ratio nanocubes of the same crystalline structure - disrupt microtubule organization and prolong mitosis, as well as deform nuclear shape, induce the formation of binucleated cells, and downregulate the tumour suppressor protein p53, whereas only the MWCNTs activate the stimulator of the interferon genes (STING) pathway, a hallmark of lung cancer. The observed differences in cellular responses to different high aspect ratio materials imply the need for assessing each nanomaterial individually with a broad range of tests rather than relying solely on a single marker or pathway, or even morphological or bulk chemical properties to infer possible carcinogenic properties.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Nanoscale
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
3
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
5
Chemical Research in Toxicology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.5%
7
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
Advanced Functional Materials
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
9
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
10
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.9%
11
Journal of Hazardous Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Metallomics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Nano Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
14
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
15
Advanced Materials
56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
16
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.1%
18
Nanoscale Advances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
20
Nature Materials
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.0%
22
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
24
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%