Customization and acceptability of the WHO Labor care guide to improve labor monitoring among health workers in Uganda. An Iterative Development Study
Mugyenyi, G. R.; Byamugisha, J.; Tumuhimbise, W.; Atukunda, E. C.; Yarine, F. T.
Show abstract
BackgroundCognisant of the persistent maternal and perinatal mortality rates, the WHO has called for adoption and evaluation of new adaptable and context-specific health solutions to improve labor monitoring and health outcomes. We aimed at customizing and refining the new WHO labour care guide (LCG) to suite health care provider (HCP) needs in monitoring labour in Southwestern Uganda. MethodsWe used an iterative approach to customize and refine the new WHO LCG. Between 1st July 2023 and 30th November 2023, we conducted; 1)30 stakeholder interviews to identify user needs and challenges, and inform the first LCG modifications; 2)10 HCP exit interviews to obtain feedback and modify LCG prototype one; 3)Two focus group discussions following use of prototype two to identify any further user needs; 4)Exit expert panel interviews involving HCPs to refine LCG components; 5)Pilot testing of final prototype among 40 HCPs; 6)Final panel reviews from two expert conferences, the National Safe Motherhood Conference, and Association of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Uganda to refine/consolidate modifications of final prototype for Uganda, ready for evaluation. ResultsA total of 120 HCPs and MOH officials previously exposed to the new WHO LCG, with median age of 36 years (IQR;26-48) were interviewed. Over 53 modifications were made to tailor the WHO LCG into the modified LCG prototype for Uganda including; 1)Adjusting observation ordering to improve flow, clarity, and facilitate an easy user interface; 2)Inclusion of vital socio-demographic data compatible with existing programs in Uganda to prompt risk identification; 3)Modification of medications, baby-mother parameters/observations to suit local context; and 4)Inclusion of key cues to action, clinical notes and labour outcome data to facilitate auditing, accountability, reference, utilization and immediate postpartum care. All HCPs found the modified LCG useful, easy to use, appropriate, comprehensive, inclusive and would recommend it to others for use. Over 80% HCPs reported they took <2 minutes to plot/fill all observations on the LCG after assessment. ConclusionsActive involvement of targeted end-users in customizing the LCG was observed to improve inclusiveness, ownership, comprehensiveness, acceptability, engagement and uptake. The modified LCG prototype was found to be simple, appropriate and easy-to-use. Further research to evaluate this LCG prototype feasibility and effectiveness is needed.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring variations in the implementation of a health system level policy intervention to improve maternal and child health outcomes in resource limited settings: A qualitative multiple case study from Uganda 96%
- An evaluation of the introduction of telehealth for remote antenatal and postnatal contacts in Bangladesh and Lao People’s Democratic Republic during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- Community-based newborn care intervention fidelity and its implementation drivers in South Wollo Zone, North-east Ethiopia 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring midwives understanding of respectful and non-abusive maternal care in Kumasi, Ghana: Qualitative Inquiry 97%
- Adoption of policies to improve respectful maternity care in Timor-Leste 97%
- Cultural adaptation of the person-centered maternity care scale at governmental health facilities in Cambodia 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units 95%
- The Menstrual Practice Needs Scale Short Form (MPNS-SF) and Rapid (MPNS-R): Development in Khulna, Bangladesh, and validation in cross-sectional surveys from Bangladesh and Uganda 95%
- Mortality Outcomes in Task-Sharing for Emergency Care: Impact of Emergency Physician Supervision on Non-Physician Emergency Care in Rural Uganda 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- What are the mechanisms of effect of group antenatal care? A systematic realist review and synthesis of the literature 95%
- Giving birth in a Pandemic: Women’s Birth Experiences in England during COVID-19 93%
- Factors affecting the mental health of pregnant women using UK maternity services during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative interview study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Views and experiences of young people on using mHealth platforms for sexual and reproductive health services in rural low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic review 95%
- Mothers’ experiences of using Facebook groups for local breastfeeding support: results of an online survey exploring midwife moderation 95%
- ePOCT+ and the medAL-suite: Development of an electronic clinical decision support algorithm and digital platform for pediatric outpatients in low- and middle-income countries 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.