Approach and Method for Bayesian Network Modelling: A Case Study in Pregnancy Outcomes for England and Wales
McLachlan, S.; Daley, B.; Saidi, S.; Kyrimi, E.; Dube, K.; Grossan, C.; Neil, M.; Rose, L.; Fenton, N.
Show abstract
Efforts to fully exploit the rich potential of Bayesian Networks (BNs) have hitherto not seen a practical approach for development of domain-specific models using large-scale public statistics which have the potential to reduce the time required to develop probability tables and train the model. As a result, the duration of projects seeking to develop health BNs tend to be measured in years due to their reliance on obtaining ethics approval and collecting, normalising, and discretising collections of patient EHRs. This work addresses this challenge by investigating a new approach to developing health BNs that combines expert elicitation with knowledge from literature and national health statistics. The approach presented here is evaluated through the development of a BN for pregnancy complications and outcomes using national health statistics for all births in England and Wales during 2021. The result is a BN that when validated using vignettes against other common types of predictive models including multivariable logistic regression and nomograms produces comparable predictions. The BN using our approach and large-scale public statistics was also developed in a project with a duration measured in months rather than years. The unique contributions of this paper are a new efficient approach to BN development and a working BN capable of reasoning over a broad range of pregnancy-related conditions and outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Creating an Ignorance-Base: Exploring Known Unknowns in the Scientific Literature 92%
- Using computable knowledge mined from the literature to elucidate confounders for EHR-based pharmacovigilance 92%
- A Deep Learning Approach for Transgender and Gender Diverse Patient Identification in Electronic Health Records 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 94%
- On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study 93%
- A Multi-Granular Stacked Regression for Forecasting Long-Term Demand in Emergency Departments 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 93%
- An AI-based approach to predict delivery outcome based on measurable factors of pregnant mothers 93%
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Common misconceptions held by health researchers when interpreting linear regression assumptions, a cross-sectional study 93%
- Population birth outcomes in 2020 and experiences of expectant mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a ‘Born in Wales’ mixed methods study using routine data 93%
- Predicting preterm births from electrohysterogram recordings via deep learning 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trajectories: a framework for detecting temporal clinical event sequences from health data standardized to the OMOP Common Data Model 94%
- Modeling physician variability to prioritize relevant medical record information 93%
- Transforming Estonian health data to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model: lessons learned 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.