Delayed effects of cigarette graphic warning labels on smoking behavior
Shi, Z.; Wang, A.-L.; Audrain-McGovern, J.; Lynch, K. G.; Loughead, J.; Langleben, D. D.
Show abstract
IntroductionGraphic warning labels (GWLs) are widely employed to communicate smoking-related health risks; however, their implementation in the US has been held back by concerns about their efficacy. Most GWLs elicit a high level of emotional reaction (ER). The extent to which ER contributes to GWLs efficacy in improving smoking outcomes is a subject of debate. Our recent study showed poorer efficacy of the high-ER GWLs versus the low-ER ones during a month-long naturalistic exposure. Whether GWL effects persist after discontinuing the exposure remains unclear. MethodsWe conducted a secondary analysis to investigate the delayed effects of GWLs on smoking severity in adult smokers. The number of cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) was measured immediately as well as 4 weeks after the end of a month-long exposure to high-ER versus low-ER GWLs. Participants indicated their subjective feeling of being relieved from having to see the GWLs. ResultsWe found a significant reduction in CPD from the immediate to the 4-week post-exposure timepoint. There was no difference in CPD reduction between the high-ER and low-ER groups. Subjective sense of relief from GWL exposure was associated with greater CPD reduction in the high-ER group, but not the low-ER group. ConclusionsOur study suggests lasting impact of GWLs on smoking behavior. The findings may be particularly important to high-arousal GWLs, which appear less effective in reducing smoking during active exposure. ImplicationsWhether GWLs that evoke higher ER are more effective remains inconclusive. We recently showed that high-ER GWLs are less effective than low-ER ones in reducing smoking during continuous exposure. Here, we found evidence of delayed GWL effects such that smoking decreased from immediately to four weeks after the end of GWL exposure. Feeling of relief from GWL exposure was associated greater smoking reduction in the high-ER group. We suggest that continuously exposing smokers to high-ER GWLs that have been well remembered may be unnecessary and counterproductive.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations between e-cigarette use and e-cigarette flavors with cigarette smoking quit attempts and quit success: Evidence from a US large, nationally representative 2018-2019 survey 96%
- Effect of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems on Cigarette Abstinence in Smokers with no Plans to Quit: Exploratory Analysis of a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial 95%
- E-cigarettes With Varenicline Versus Varenicline for Smoking Cessation: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Transitions from smoking to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use, or stopping nicotine use in ALSPAC and their association with modifiable and sociodemographic factors 95%
- Moderators of changes in smoking, drinking, and quitting behaviour associated with the first Covid-19 lockdown in England 93%
- Impact of health warning labels and calorie labels on selection and purchasing of alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks: a randomised controlled trial 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.