Back

TrustAffinity: accurate, reliable and scalable out-of-distribution protein-ligand binding affinity prediction using trustworthy deep learning

Badkul, A.; Xie, L.; Zhang, S.; Xie, L.

2024-01-08 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.01.05.574359 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Polypharmacology has emerged as a new paradigm to discover novel therapeutics for unmet medical needs. Accurate, reliable and scalable predictions of protein-ligand binding affinity across multiple proteins are essential for polypharmacology. Machine learning is a promising tool for multi-target binding affinity predictions, often formulated as a multi-modal regression problem. Despite considerable efforts, three challenges remain: out-of-distribution (OOD) generalizations for compounds with new chemical scaffolds, uncertainty quantification of OOD predictions, and scalability to billions of compounds, which structure-based methods fail to achieve. To address aforementioned challenges, we propose a new model-agnostic anomaly detection-based uncertainty quantification method, embedding Mahalanobis Outlier Scoring and Anomaly Identification via Clustering (eMOSAIC). eMOSAIC uniquely quantifies distribution similarities or differences between the multi-modal representation of known cases and that of a new unseen one. We apply eMOSAIC to a multi-modal deep neural network model for multi-target ligand binding affinity predictions, leveraging a pre-trained strucrture-informed large protein language model. We extensively validate eMOSAIC in OOD settings, showing that it significantly outperforms state-of-the-art sequence-based deep learning and structure-based protein-ligand docking (PLD) methods by a large margin as well as existing uncertainty quantification methods. This finding highlights eMOSAICs potential for real-world polypharmacology and other applications.

Published in Nature Machine Intelligence (predicted rank #15) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.