Perspectives of young people, family carers and voluntary sector staff on help-seeking for mental health difficulties in a rural region of the United Kingdom - a qualitative study.
Oduola, S.; Coombes, E.; Hodgekins, J.; Jones, A.
Show abstract
PurposeTo explore key stakeholders from rural communities perspectives of help-seeking for mental health difficulties. Methods/designSemi-structured interviews and a focus group were conducted with participants living in the East of England, UK. Thematic analysis was used to organise and analyse the data. ResultsNine participants were recruited. Participants described barriers and facilitators of help-seeking. Barriers included: lengthy waiting times, socioeconomic means, poor therapeutic relationships, insufficient treatment duration, poor transition between services, high staff turnover, and limited investment. Facilitators included: family involvement/support, school nurses, shorter delays in accessing specialist services such as eating disorder services, and the offer of family therapy. Suggestions for improving future help-seeking and pathways to care, included: peer-support for young people, enhanced support for carers, early intervention and raising awareness of mental health. OriginalityOur qualitative approach meant we were able to explore in detail the existence and mechanisms underlying varied barriers and facilitators of care pathways amongst our sample. This allowed us to report rich findings and recommendations for clinical practice and future research work. Practical implicationsTraining young people to support other young people, and identifying mental health champions in rural communities could reduce distress and ameliorate pressures on the health service.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 98%
- Clinician views on best practice community care for people with complex emotional needs and how it can be achieved: a qualitative study 97%
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘I had no life. I was only existing’ . Factors shaping the mental health and wellbeing of people experiencing long Covid: a qualitative study 96%
- One year later: Tracking the continued growth of mental illness stigma in England 93%
- Effectiveness, acceptability and potential harms of peer support for self-harm in non-clinical settings: A systematic review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinician perspectives on what constitutes good practice in community services for people with Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic meta-synthesis 97%
- Service user experiences of community services for Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic synthesis 97%
- Mapping young people’s journeys through mental health services: a prospective longitudinal qualitative study protocol 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 98%
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 96%
- “You’re just there, alone in your room with your thoughts” A qualitative study about the impact of lockdown among young people during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Business as Un-usual: Access to mental health and primary care services for people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 restrictions 97%
- Recovery from severe mental health problems: A systematic review of service user and informal caregiver perspectives 96%
- Priorities for Future Research about Screen Use and Adolescent Mental Health: A Participatory Prioritization Study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.