Back

Streamlining the alignment of UAV and TLS forest point clouds: an approach based on ground and tree stems

Puletti, N.; Innocenti, S.; Guasti, M.

2024-01-09 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.01.03.574086 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate co-registration of terrestrial and aerial point clouds may provide a high-resolution description of tree components for large forest areas. However, an automated approach for co-registering point clouds is still needed, given the challenges in geospatial data processing, particularly in complex topographical conditions. The main objective of this study is to present the application of a novel procedure for the co-registration of point clouds obtained from terrestrial and UAV surveys in Mediter-ranean forests.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.2%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Peer Community Journal
● 281 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
11.3%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
○ 176 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.0%
Similar papers in this journal
4
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Frontiers in Plant Science
○ 256 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.5%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.4%
7
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Plant Methods
○ 42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
○ 98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
10
Scientific Data
○ 209 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
Animals
○ 23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Ecology and Evolution
○ 267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
13
Forest Ecology and Management
○ 27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
● 242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
15
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
Insects
○ 42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
Sensors
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
Global Ecology and Conservation
○ 25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
20
Remote Sensing
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Ecological Indicators
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Physiologia Plantarum
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Plant Phenomics
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
○ 41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.