Back

Quantification of Cerebrospinal Fluid Tumor DNA in Lung Cancer Patients with Suspected Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis

Azad, T. D.; Nanjo, S.; Jin, M. C.; Chabon, J. J.; Kurtz, D. M.; Chaudhuri, A. A.; Connolly, I. D.; Hui, A. B.; Liu, C. L.; Merriott, D.; Ko, R.; Yoo, C.; Carter, J.; Chen, E.; Bonilla, R.; Hata, A.; Katakami, N.; Irie, K.; Yano, S.; Okimoto, R.; Bivona, T. G.; Newman, A. M.; Iv, M.; Nagpal, S.; Hayden Gephart, M.; Alizadeh, A. A.; Diehn, M.

2024-01-04 oncology
10.1101/2024.01.03.23300646 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionCerebrospinal fluid tumor-derived DNA (CSF-tDNA) analysis is a promising approach for monitoring neoplastic processes of the central nervous system. We hypothesize that analysis of CSF-tDNA in patients with advanced lung cancer improves the sensitivity of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) diagnosis and enables central nervous system response monitoring. MethodsWe applied CAPP-Seq using a lung cancer-specific sequencing panel to 81 CSF, blood, and tissue samples from 24 patients with advanced lung cancer who underwent lumbar puncture (LP) for suspected LMD. A subset of the cohort (N = 12) participated in a prospective clinical trial of osimertinib for refractory LMD in which serial LPs were performed before and during treatment with. ResultsCSF-tDNA variant allele fractions (VAFs) were significantly higher than plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) VAFs (median CSF-tDNA, 32.7%; median plasma ctDNA, 1.8%; P < 0.0001). Concentrations of tumor DNA in CSF and plasma were positively correlated (Spearmans {rho}, 0.45; P = 0.03). For LMD diagnosis, cytology was 81.8% sensitive and CSF-tDNA was 91.7% sensitive. CSF-tDNA was also strongly prognostic for overall survival (HR = 7.1; P = 0.02). Among patients with progression on targeted therapy, resistance mutations, such as EGFR T790M and MET amplification, were common in peripheral blood but were rare in time-matched CSF, indicating differences in resistance mechanisms based on anatomic compartment. In the osimertinib cohort, patients with CNS progression had increased CSF-tDNA VAFs at follow up LP. Post-osimertinib CSF-tDNA VAF was strongly prognostic for CNS progression (HR = 6.2, P = 0.009). ConclusionsDetection of CSF-tDNA in lung cancer patients with suspected LMD is feasible and may have clinical utility. CSF-tDNA may improve the sensitivity of LMD diagnosis, enable improved prognostication, and drive therapeutic strategies that account for spatial heterogeneity in resistance mechanisms.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.3%
2
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
4
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
5
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.7%
7
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
9
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
13
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
14
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
16
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
17
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
18
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
20
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
22
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
26
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.7%
30
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%