Back

Wing shape evolution is not constrained by ancestral genetic covariances in the invasive Drosophila suzukii

Fraimout, A.; Chantepie, S.; Navarro, N.; Teplitsky, C.; Debat, V.

2026-01-24 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.01.02.573869 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The extent to which phenotypic evolution can be constrained by genetic correlations is an important question in evolutionary biology. To address this question, biological invasions are opportune models where derived, invasive populations can be compared to their extant ancestors, allowing to track the evolution of genetic correlations from the ancestor, throughout the invasion process. In this paper, we focused on the worldwide invasion of Drosophila suzukii (Matsumara, 1931), and investigated the evolution of the genetic covariance matrix G of wing shape between ancestral native, and derived invasive populations. Leveraging demographic history resolved by population genetics approaches, we tested whether G remained stable during the invasion. Using a multivariate QST-FST approach, we further tested whether or not the observed phenotypic divergence in wing shape aligned with a neutral scenario of evolution. Our results show moderate yet significant quantitative genetic differentiation of wing shape among D. suzukii populations and a relative stability in the structure of G, presenting a roughly spherical shape but slightly different volumes. These characteristics likely reflect the demographic history of populations and suggest a low level of genetic constraint on wing shape evolution. The divergence between populations was greater than expected under a purely neutral model of evolution, compatible with an effect of divergent selection among them. Overall, our study suggests that selection and drift, but not ancestral genetic constraints, affected the early stages of wing shape evolution during D. suzukii invasion.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.2%
2
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
4
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.1%
5
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
6
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
8
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
11
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
12
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
13
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
15
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
17
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.9%
20
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%