Capability and reliability of deep learning models to make density predictions on low dose mammograms
Squires, S.; Mackenzie, A.; Evans, D. G.; Howell, S. J.; Astley, S. M.
Show abstract
PurposeBreast density is associated with risk of developing cancer and can be automatically estimated, using deep learning models, from digital mammograms. Our aim is to estimate the capacity and reliability of such models to estimate density from low dose mammograms taken to enable risk estimates for younger women. MethodsWe trained deep learning models on standard and simulated low dose mammograms. The models were then tested on a mammography data-set with paired standard and low-dose image. The effect of different factors (including age, density and dose ratio) on the differences between predictions on standard and low dose are analysed. Methods to improve performance are assessed and factors that reduce model quality are demonstrated. ResultsWe showed that whilst many factors have no significant effect on the quality of low dose density prediction both density and breast area have an impact. For example correlation between density predictions on low and standard dose images of breasts with the largest breast area is 0.985 (0.949-0.995) while with the smallest is 0.882 (0.697-0.961). We also demonstrated that averaging across CC-MLO images and across repeatedly trained models can improve predictive performance. ConclusionLow dose mammography can be used to produce density and risk estimates that are comparable to standard dose images. Averaging across CC-MLO and across model predictions should improve this performance. Model quality is reduced when making predictions on denser and smaller breasts. Code is available at: https://github.com/stevensquires/
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Breast density prediction from low and standard dose mammograms using deep learning: effect of image resolution and model training approach on prediction quality 97%
- Recent advances in the clinical applications of machine learning in proton therapy 94%
- Model uncertainty estimates for deep learning mammographic density prediction using ordinal and classification approaches 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of inverse treatment planning for Gamma Knife radiosurgery using fMRI brain activation maps as organs at risk 93%
- SCU-Net: A deep learning method for segmentation and quantification of breast arterial calcifications on mammograms 92%
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- “E Pluribus Unum”: Prospective acceptability benchmarking from the Contouring Collaborative for Consensus in Radiation Oncology (C3RO) Crowdsourced Initiative for Multi-Observer Segmentation 94%
- Coronary artery calcium mass measurement based on integrated intensity and volume fraction techniques 93%
- The Effect of Image Resolution on Automated Classification of Chest X-rays 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.