Partial RNA Design
Runge, F.; Franke, J. K. H.; Fertmann, D.; Backofen, R.; Hutter, F.
Show abstract
RNA design is a key technique to achieve new functionality in fields like synthetic biology or biotechnology. Computational tools could help to find such RNA sequences but they are often limited in their formulation of the search space. In this work, we propose partial RNA design, a novel RNA design paradigm that addresses the limitations of current RNA design formulations. Partial RNA design describes the problem of designing RNAs from arbitrary RNA sequences and structure motifs with multiple design goals. By separating the design space from the objectives, our formulation enables the design of RNAs with variable lengths and desired properties, while still allowing precise control over sequence and structure constraints at individual positions. Based on this formulation, we introduce a new algorithm, libLEARNA, capable of efficiently solving different constraint RNA design tasks. A comprehensive analysis of various problems, including a realistic riboswitch design task, reveals the outstanding performance of libLEARNA and its robustness.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Concurrent prediction of RNA secondary structures with pseudoknots and local 3D motifs in an Integer Programming framework 97%
- Scalable Differentiable for mRNA Design 97%
- ConsAlign: simultaneous RNA structural aligner based on rich transfer learning and thermodynamic ensemble model of alignment scoring 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- RNA-EFM : Energy based Flow Matching for Protein-conditioned RNA Sequence-Structure Co-design 97%
- UTRGAN: Learning to Generate 5' UTR Sequences for Optimized Translation Efficiency and Gene Expression 94%
- LinAliFold and CentroidLinAliFold: Fast RNA consensus secondary structure prediction for aligned sequences using beam search methods 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.