Multi-contrast high-field quality image synthesis for portable low-field MRI using generative adversarial networks and paired data
Lucas, A.; Arnold, T. C.; Okar, S. V.; Vadali, C.; Kawatra, K. D.; Ren, Z.; Cao, Q.; Shinohara, R. T.; Schindler, M. K.; Davis, K. A.; Litt, B.; Reich, D. S.; Stein, J. M.
Show abstract
IntroductionPortable low-field strength (64mT) MRI scanners promise to increase access to neuroimaging for clinical and research purposes, however these devices produce lower quality images compared to high-field scanners. In this study, we developed and evaluated a deep learning architecture to generate high-field quality brain images from low-field inputs using a paired dataset of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients scanned at 64mT and 3T. MethodsA total of 49 MS patients were scanned on portable 64mT and standard 3T scanners at Penn (n=25) or the National Institutes of Health (NIH, n=24) with T1-weighted, T2-weighted and FLAIR acquisitions. Using this paired data, we developed a generative adversarial network (GAN) architecture for low- to high-field image translation (LowGAN). We then evaluated synthesized images with respect to image quality, brain morphometry, and white matter lesions. ResultsSynthetic high-field images demonstrated visually superior quality compared to low-field inputs and significantly higher normalized cross-correlation (NCC) to actual high-field images for T1 (p=0.001) and FLAIR (p<0.001) contrasts. LowGAN generally outperformed the current state- of-the-art for low-field volumetrics. For example, thalamic, lateral ventricle, and total cortical volumes in LowGAN outputs did not differ significantly from 3T measurements. Synthetic outputs preserved MS lesions and captured a known inverse relationship between total lesion volume and thalamic volume. ConclusionsLowGAN generates synthetic high-field images with comparable visual and quantitative quality to actual high-field scans. Enhancing portable MRI image quality could add value and boost clinician confidence, enabling wider adoption of this technology.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Generation of Cerebral Blood Flow Maps Using Deep Learning and Multiple Delay Arterial Spin-Labelled MRI 97%
- Vendor-neutral sequences (VENUS) and fully transparent workflows improve inter-vendor reproducibility of quantitative MRI 96%
- A 3T investigation of B1+-inhomogeneity tolerance in MP2RAGE-based R1-mapping by calculating second contrast that permits previously problematic sequence parameters 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Ultra-low-field paediatric MRI in low- and middle-income countries: super-resolution using a multi-orientation U-Net 96%
- Lesion aware automated processing pipeline for multimodal neuroimaging stroke data and The Virtual Brain (TVB) 96%
- OpenMAP-T1: A Rapid Deep Learning Approach to Parcellate 280 Anatomical Regions to Cover the Whole Brain 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lowering the Thermal Noise Barrier in Functional Brain Mapping with Magnetic Resonance Imaging 96%
- Anatomy-to-Tract Mapping Infers White Matter Pathways Without Diffusion Streamline Propagation 95%
- The BigMac dataset: an open resource combining multi-contrast MRI and microscopy in the macaque brain 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated joint skull-stripping and segmentation with Multi-Task U-Net in large mouse brain MRI databases 97%
- Fusion of quantitative susceptibility maps and T1-weighted images improve braintissue contrast in primates 96%
- Tensor Image Registration Library: Automated Deformable Registration of Stand-Alone Histology Images to Whole-Brain Post-Mortem MRI Data 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.