Back

From Inhibition to Excitation and Why: The Role of Temporal Urgency in Modulating Corticospinal Activity

McInnes, A. N.; Smithers, B.; Lipp, O. V.; Tresilian, J. R.; Vallence, A.-M.; Rothwell, J. C.; Marinovic, W.

2023-12-28 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.12.27.573452 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Previous research on movement preparation identified a period of corticospinal suppression about 200 ms prior to movement initiation. This phenomenon has been observed for different types of motor tasks typically used to investigate movement preparation (e.g., reaction time, self-initiated, and anticipatory actions). However, we recently discovered that this phenomenon is not observed when actions must be initiated under time pressure. In the present study, we investigated urgency effects on corticospinal suppression throughout the time course of an anticipatory timing task. Participants were required to perform timing actions under two urgency scenarios, high and low, and we applied single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation at different times during the time course of preparation. We analysed the time course of excitability under high and low scenarios in relation to expected and actual movement onset times. Our results confirmed our earlier findings that corticospinal suppression is not observed when participants perform actions under high urgency scenarios. In addition, we found no evidence that this preparatory suppression could be shifted in time to occur later under high urgency scenarios. Moreover, we found evidence that responses prepared under high urgency are more likely to be disrupted by external events (e.g., TMS pulses). These results suggest that preparatory suppression might be a strategy employed by the central nervous system to shield motor actions from interference of external events (e.g., loud sounds) when time allows. Given these data, we propose conceptual models that could account for the absence of preparatory suppression under time pressure to act.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
2
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
8.2%
4
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.0%
5
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
6
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.6%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
10
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
11
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.7%
14
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
20
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
23
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
24
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
27
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
29
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%