Back

Vocalization Patterns in Laying Hens - An Analysis of Stress-Induced Audio Responses

Neethirajan, S.

2023-12-26 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2023.12.26.573338 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study leverages Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) to analyze the vocalization patterns of laying hens, focusing on their responses to both visual (umbrella opening) and auditory (dog barking) stressors at different ages. The aim is to understand how these diverse stressors, along with the hens age and the timing of stress application, affect their vocal behavior. Utilizing a comprehensive dataset of chicken vocal recordings, both from stress-exposed and control groups, the research enables a detailed comparative analysis of vocal responses to varied environmental stimuli. A significant outcome of this study is the distinct vocal patterns exhibited by younger chickens compared to older ones, suggesting developmental variations in stress response. This finding contributes to a deeper understanding of poultry welfare, demon-strating the potential of non-invasive vocalization analysis for early stress detection and aligning with ethical live-stock management practices. The CNN models ability to distinguish between pre- and post-stress vocalizations highlights the substantial impact of stressor application on chicken vocal behavior. This study not only sheds light on the nuanced interactions between stress stimuli and animal behavior but also marks a significant advancement in smart farming. It paves the way for real-time welfare assessments and more informed decision-making in poultry management. Looking forward, the study suggests avenues for longitudinal research on chronic stress and the application of these methodologies across different species and farming contexts. Ultimately, this research represents a pivotal step in integrating technology with animal welfare, offering a promising approach to transforming welfare assessments in animal husbandry.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.6%
4
Poultry Science
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
6
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
7
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
8
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
9
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
12
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
13
Physiology & Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
14
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
23
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
25
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%
28
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%