CompHEAR: A Customizable and Scalable Web-Enabled Auditory Performance Evaluation Platform for Cochlear Implant Sound Processing Research
Tward, A.; Merrill, K.; Muller, L.; Beim, J. A.; Hehrmann, P.; Swan, D.; Alfsmann, D.; Spahr, T.; Litvak, L.; Oxenham, A. J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveCochlear implants (CIs) are auditory prostheses for individuals with severe to profound hearing loss, offering substantial but incomplete restoration of hearing function by stimulating the auditory nerve using electrodes. However, progress in CI performance and innovation has been constrained by the inability to rapidly test multiple sound processing strategies. Current research interfaces provided by major CI manufacturers have limitations in supporting a wide range of auditory experiments due to portability, programming difficulties, and the lack of direct comparison between sound processing algorithms. To address these limitations, we present the CompHEAR research platform, designed specifically for the Cochlear Implant Hackathon, enabling researchers to conduct diverse auditory experiments on a large scale. Study DesignQuasi-experimental SettingVirtual MethodsCompHEAR is an open-source, user-friendly platform which offers flexibility and ease of customization, allowing researchers to set up a broad set of auditory experiments. CompHEAR employs a vocoder to simulate novel sound coding strategies for CIs. It facilitates even distribution of listening tasks among participants and delivers real-time metrics for evaluation. The software architecture underlies the platforms flexibility in experimental design and its wide range of applications in sound processing research. ResultsPerformance testing of the CompHEAR platform ensured that it could support at least 10,000 concurrent users. The CompHEAR platform was successfully implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and enabled global collaboration for the CI Hackathon (www.cihackathon.com). ConclusionThe CompHEAR platform is a useful research tool that permits comparing diverse signal processing strategies across a variety of auditory tasks with crowdsourced judging. Its versatility, scalability, and ease of use can enable further research with the goal of promoting advancements in cochlear implant performance and improved patient outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-time control of a hearing instrument with EEG-based attention decoding 93%
- Towards Decoding Selective Attention Through Cochlear Implant Electrodes as Sensors in Subjects with Contralateral Acoustic Hearing 92%
- The Speech Reception Threshold Can be Estimated Using EEG Electrodes In and Around the Ear 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Capabilities of the CCi-Mobile Cochlear Implant Research Platform for Real-Time Sound Coding 96%
- Focality of sound source placement by higher (9th) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors 95%
- Magnified interaural level differences enhance spatial release from masking in bilateral cochlear implant users 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differentiating Causes of Post-Surgical Conductive Hearing Loss with Optical Coherence Tomography Vibrometry 94%
- Rate discrimination training may partially restore temporal processing abilities from age-related deficits 92%
- Enhanced Place Specificity of the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response: An Electrophysiological Study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.