Back

Connectivity at home: A data-driven connectivity modeling framework for home range movements in heterogeneous landscapes

Merkens, L.; Mimet, A.; Bae, S.; Fairbairn, A.; Muehlbauer, M.; Lauppe, E.; Mesarek, F.; Stauffer-Bescher, D.; Hauck, T. E.; Weisser, W. W.

2023-12-23 ecology
10.1101/2023.12.22.571399 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The landscape connectivity of cities is increasingly recognized as crucial for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services. Yet, modelling ecological connectivity in cities remains challenging because landscape resistance is often based on expert judgment rather than empirical evidence, leading to varying modelling results and limited use for planning. We developed and tested a data-driven framework for empirically parametrizing resistance and movement-distance parameters in functional connectivity models from movement-proxy data - information on the presence/absence of animal movement from direct observation or camera traps. At each step, we ensured that the connectivity model reflected the behavioural and spatial properties of the observations. We applied the framework for the common blackbird (Turdus merula) in Munich, Germany. We used observations of flying blackbirds as movement-proxy data in a logistic regression framework, testing alternative combinations of resistance and movement distances. Model selection identified the parameter sets best supported by the data. The resulting parameters were validated using repeated out-of-sample validation and compared against an expert-based connectivity model. Connectivity derived from empirically estimated parameters increased the probability of observing flying blackbirds. Across repeated validations, the empirical model achieved a mean AUC of 0.76 and R2 of 0.17. It performed moderately better than the expert-based model. Depending on their height, buildings exhibited varying resistance to flying blackbirds. Results indicate that expert assessments may oversimplify urban barriers. The approach provides a transparent, reproducible framework for using movement-proxy data to derive maps of landscape resistance. It offers a step toward more data-driven urban connectivity modelling.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.0%
2
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
4
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
9
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
10
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.0%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
17
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
18
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
20
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
22
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
25
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
30
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%