Co-design and refinement of an optimised antenatal education session to better inform women and prepare them for labour and birth.
Merriel, A.; Toolan, M.; Lynch, M.; Clayton, G. L.; Demetri, A.; Willis, L.; Mampitiya, N.; Clarke, A.; Birchenall, K.; de Souza, C.; Harvey, E.; Russel-Webster, T.; Larkai, E.; Grzeda, M.; Rawling, K.; Barnfield, S.; Smith, M.; Plachcinski, R.; Burden, C.; Fraser, A.; Larkin, M.; Davies, A.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo co-design, implement, evaluate acceptability and refine an optimised antenatal education session to improve birth preparedness. DesignThere were four distinct phases: co-design (focus groups and co-design workshops with parents and staff); implementation of intervention; evaluation (interviews, questionnaires, structured feedback forms), and systematic refinement. SettingA single maternity unit with approximately 5,500 births annually. ParticipantsPostnatal and antenatal women/birthing people, birth partners and clinicians. Outcome measures: To establish whether the optimised session is deliverable, acceptable, meets the needs of women/birthing people and partners, and refine it with input from parents, clinicians and researchers. ResultsThe co-design was undertaken by 35 women, partners and clinicians. Five midwives were trained and delivered 19 Antenatal education (ACE) sessions to 142 women and 94 partners. 121 women and 33 birth partners completed the feedback questionnaire. Women/birthing people(79%) and birth partners(82%) felt more prepared after the class with most participants finding the content very helpful or helpful. Women/birthing people perceived classes were more useful and engaging than their partners. Interviews with 21 parents, a midwife focus group and a structured feedback form resulted in 38 recommended changes: 22 by parents, 5 by midwives and 11 by both. Suggested changes have been incorporated in the training resources to achieve an optimised intervention. ConclusionsEngaging stakeholders (women and staff) in co-designing an evidence informed curriculum resulted in an antenatal class designed to improve preparedness for birth, including assisted birth, that is acceptable to women and their birthing partners, and has been refined to address feedback and is deliverable within NHS resource constraints. A nationally-mandated antenatal education curriculum is needed to ensure parents receive high-quality antenatal education that targets birth preparedness. Key messagesO_ST_ABSWhat is already knownC_ST_ABSAntenatal education is used to prepare women/birthing parents for labour, birth and the postnatal period, but it has been eroded. Antenatal education has potential to support women/birthing parents in developing their expectations around labour and the postnatal period, via improved health literacy. Improving antenatal education could be impactful as the expectation-experience gap is linked to post traumatic stress disorder. What this study addsWe have shown that a co-designed, optimised antenatal class can provide information helpful to parents and important to staff, within the constraints of the NHS resources How this study might affect research, practice or policyThis study can be used to understand what parents need from antenatal education, and how to begin to address the expectation-experience gap.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Giving birth in a Pandemic: Women’s Birth Experiences in England during COVID-19 96%
- What are the mechanisms of effect of group antenatal care? A systematic realist review and synthesis of the literature 96%
- Factors affecting the mental health of pregnant women using UK maternity services during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative interview study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units 97%
- Companionship for women using English maternity services during COVID-19: National and organisational perspectives 96%
- Mapping factors that may influence attrition and retention of midwives: a scoping review protocol 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Making maternity and neonatal care personalised in the COVID-19 pandemic: results from the Babies Born Better Survey in the UK and the Netherlands 96%
- Exploring the relationship between women’s experience of postnatal care and reported staffing measures: an observational study 95%
- Population birth outcomes in 2020 and experiences of expectant mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a ‘Born in Wales’ mixed methods study using routine data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 94%
- A qualitative study investigating the acceptability of cervical screening and self-sampling in postnatal women at 6-week postnatal check-up 93%
- Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing among un- and under-screened Māori, Pasifika, and Asian women in Aotearoa New Zealand: a preference survey among responders and interviews with clinical-trial non-responders 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Family-centered postnatal training and adherence to newborn care practices in district hospitals in two Indian states: A quasi-experimental intervention study 94%
- Evaluating the impact of an enhanced support implementation of the PReCePT (PRevention of Cerebral palsy in Pre-Term labour) quality improvement toolkit to increase the uptake of magnesium sulphate in pre-term deliveries for the prevention of neurodisabilities: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial 93%
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.