Self-Management Competence in Depressed In-Patients: A Prospective Observational Study
Schnierer, N.; Reinhard, I.; Wagner-Dörr, J. M.; Nater, U. M.; Bender, M.; Wehmeier, P. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundStudies suggest that good self-management is associated with better coping with chronic mental conditions. However, an encompassing assessment of the relationship between depression and self-management competence is lacking. MethodsThis study assesses the relationship between depressiveness and self-management competence in a sample of 83 depressed in-patients. Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) was used to assess depressiveness. The Self-Management Self-Test (SMST) was used to assess self-management competence. Patient surveys took place at the time of hospital admission (T1) and at the time of hospital discharge or approximately 4 to 6 weeks after (T2). ResultsSelf-management competence correlated negatively with depressiveness at T1. Four out of five specific dimensions of self-management competence correlated inversely with depressiveness at T1. Self-management competence differed depending on the severity of the depressive syndrome and was higher the lower the severity of the depressive syndrome was. In the course of clinical treatment, self-management competence increased. Change of self-management competence during clinical treatment was not dependent on the sociodemographic variables gender or age. Change of self-management competence during clinical treatment predicted the change of depressiveness between hospital admission and discharge (T2 vs. T1) as well as depressiveness at T2. LimitationsSample size was relatively small. The SMST is a relatively new psychometric instrument that has not yet found widespread use in clinical research. ConclusionOur findings offer clinical evidence that in depressed in-patients, self-management competence and depressiveness are associated constructs. These results suggest that self-management competence may be a valuable resource in the treatment of depressive disorders.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The association between stigmatizing attitudes towards depression and help seeking attitudes in college students 96%
- Changes in hospital staff mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic: longitudinal results from the international COPE-CORONA study 95%
- Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anhedonia, Depression, and Symptom Severity in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder 93%
- Depression polygenic scores are associated with major depressive disorder diagnosis and depressive episode in Mexican adolescents 93%
- The cerebellum as a moderator of negative bias of facial expression processing in depressive patients 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A single dose of lamotrigine induces a positive memory bias in healthy volunteers 93%
- Self-blaming emotions in major depression: a randomised pilot trial comparing fMRI neurofeedback training with self-guided psychological strategies (NeuroMooD) 93%
- Social relationships and depression during the COVID-19 lockdown: longitudinal analysis of the COVID-19 social study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.