Effects of changes in calculating GFR using KDIGO standards: Discordance in the Staging and Timing of Diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease
Baker, C.; Gratzl, S.; Rodriguez, P. J.; simonov, m.; Cartwright, B.; brar, r.; Stucky, N.
Show abstract
IntroductionChronic kidney disease (CKD) is a highly prevalent disease with disparities in diagnosis and treatment. Until recently, primary diagnosis for CKD was based on equations that incorporated race and have demonstrated racial bias. This study had two aims comparing outcomes for Black patients and their counterparts: 1) whether using the new 2021 CKD-EPI equation led to decreased disparity with time to diagnosis; and 2) whether there was discordance in the staging between the two equations at potential diagnosis point. MethodsWe evaluated patients aged 18 and over with non-hospitalization related serum creatinine laboratory results between January 1, 2016 and September 30, 2023. We estimated the GFR for each patient using the 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine equations. We assessed stage discordance for stages 3a, 3b, 4, and 5 using chi-square tests and the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel. We used multivariate logistic regression to assess a change in staging based on the equation used. Results15.5% of the 8,080,889 patients included in this study were Black. The median age was 57 years and 15.3% of patients met the criteria for stage 3a CKD or higher using either equation. Discordance in staging by equation and by race existed, especially for Black patients at stages 3a and 3b. 40% of Black patients identified as stage 4 using the 2021 equation were 3b or lower using the 2009 equation. DiscussionWell established medical algorithms with race components are being re-examined. We found more disparity with the initial staging of the disease. The disconnect in the timing of staging by equation for Black patients means a number of these patients may not have received the appropriate treatment. Future work should elucidate the impact of the change in CKD staging with the 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine equation on treatment. ConclusionSignificant disparity exists in the timing and staging of CKD by CKD-EPI equation and by race.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- External validation of six clinical models for prediction of unknown chronic kidney disease in a German population 97%
- Comparison of the prevalence and associated factors of chronic kidney disease diagnosed by serum creatinine or cystatin C among young people living with HIV in Uganda 95%
- Ramadan and Kidney disease (RaK) risk assessment tool. Potential Risk Calculator for Evaluating the Risk of Ramadan Fasting In Chronic Kidney Disease patients 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of low eGFR prevalence and prediction for mortality using 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPI equations in Mexican adults 95%
- Circulating Plasma Biomarkers in Biopsy-Confirmed Kidney Disease: Results from the Boston Kidney Biopsy Cohort 94%
- Impaired incretin homeostasis in non-diabetic moderate-severe CKD 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Progression of chronic kidney disease among black patients attending a tertiary hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa 96%
- Demographic and clinical profile of black patients with chronic kidney disease attending Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH) in Johannesburg, South Africa. 95%
- Chronic Kidney Disease in Ecuador: An Epidemiological and Health System Analysis of an Emerging Public Health Crisis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The prevalence of chronic kidney disease in Australian primary care: analysis of a national general practice dataset 96%
- Shared Decision-Making in Renal Replacement Therapy Selection: Patient Perceptions, Preferences, and Influencing Factors in a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in Japan 95%
- A functional landscape of chronic kidney disease entities from public transcriptomic data 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.